{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://reefs.com/#organization","name":"","url":"https://reefs.com/","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/reefscom","https://www.linkedin.com/company/reefs-com","http://www.youtube.com/c/Reefscom","https://www.pinterest.com/reefscom/","https://twitter.com/reefscom"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://reefs.com/#website","url":"https://reefs.com/","name":"Reefs.com","publisher":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/#organization"},"potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://reefs.com/?s={search_term_string}","query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#webpage","url":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/","inLanguage":"en-US","name":"Julian Sprung\u2019s NOAA / ESA Commentary - Reefs.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/#website"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#primaryimage","url":"https://cdn.reefs.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/7090ORA_RedGoni_byMattPedersen_DSC_0076_RGB-150x150.jpg","width":150,"height":150},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2013-04-08T14:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-10T22:47:17+00:00","description":"Julian Sprung\u2019s NOAA / ESA Commentary - 06 Apr, 2013 Seeing red yet? Trade in maricultured and aquacultured corals may (or may not) \u00a0have a chance. (ORA Red Goniopora / image Matt Pedersen) 11:59 PM EST April 5th, 2013 has passed and Regulations.gov appears to still be accepting public commentary, so you have another 11 hours or so to say your piece online. \u00a0 In light of this one last chance, Julian Sprung, well-known author, MASNA Aquarist of the Year, founder of Two Little Fishies, and a member of the CORAL Sr. Advisory Board, shares his opinions on why failing to speak up isn\u2019t an option. Opinion by Julian Sprung Foreword to my commentary letter In early January Dustin Dorton and the owners of ORA organized a meeting at ORA with\u00a0people from NOAA and a group of people from the aquarium industry, from PIJAC, from the University of Florida Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, and the Florida Division of Aquaculture. I was also invited and was glad for the opportunity. It was an extremely informative meeting for everyone. There were a few key take-home messages. 1. It appeared that this train (ESA listing of corals) was not stopping. 2. The room for control in making a decision is set up by the structure of how ESA implementation works, not by any individuals at NOAA. As they put it, our agency (NOAA) does not have the discretion, only the ESA sets the rules. 3. Public commentary should focus on factual errors in the literature cited in the proposal, and should bring to light any new data from the scientific literature. Public commentary regarding the collateral impacts on industries affected by an ESA ruling have no influence on the decision, because that is the way the ESA is written. They put it this way: Our comments should focus only on whether a particular species is threatened or not. They should not focus on whether NOAA should or should not list. This of course puts the position of public commentary for the most part in the category of useless. Does the general public have the qualification to discuss the threatened or endangered status of specific coral species? 4. Although a read of online information about the ESA suggests that any listing of corals as endangered would make possession of them illegal, the representatives from NOAA assured us that a listing as endangered would not prohibit the keeping of those corals already in aquariums. It would not criminalize our hobby. What it would do is prevent the TRADE of corals listed as endangered. That means no import no export no sale. It was a little unclear whether that also meant no in-kind trading. Basically this threatened the farmers, shops, frag swaps, and any form of business engaged in the commerce of corals, in the USA. By contrast, a listing as threatened would not prevent commerce of those species. Given the conflicting information out there, what do you suppose would happen if corals were to be listed? 5. We were told that NOAA had the ability to control the activity of the US Fish and Wildlife Service at the USA ports of entry, so that FWS would not utilize any ESA listing as a reason to shut down coral imports. Do you believe that?\u00a0Scientists have already pointed out a broad range of errors in the science used to support the ESA listing proposal, and the statistical methods used. New data has also been presented. Evidence from the scientific literature has been presented that shows the premise of the need for listing any corals is in error. Comments have already been\u00a0submitted about the status of individual species proposed for listing. While it can\u02bct hurt\u00a0to add more to that in the few hours that remain for public comment, and there is no\u00a0shortage of areas to explore for finding error, I believe that enough is enough.\u00a0I am not proud of the letter I wrote.\u00a0There are many very good scientists at NOAA. I don\u02bct wish to offend them but I can\u02bct help but be offended by what is happening, and felt\u00a0the need to call what I see. Why should NOAA tell us that we cannot question the use of the ESA for coral conservation? Who are we really talking to with this public commentary? The ESA is not an agency, NOAA is. Are their hands so tied by the ESA structure and the petition submitted by a litigious Center for Biological diversity? Craig Watson, who also was at the meeting at ORA, submitted a letter that pointed out the fact that using the effects of greenhouse gas emissions as a basis for listing corals that are not now threatened with extinction sets a terrible precedent and exposes the ESA to attack. After all, as he put it: \u201cIf the predictions on climate change used in the petition and the subsequent review are accurate, there is very little life on this planet that one could not argue would be equally \u02bbthreatened\u02bc or \u02bbendangered\u2019 \u2026..If approved and adopted by NOAA, the precedent\u00a0established by this use of the ESA will result in a list of endangered species that is so\u00a0inclusive, there will be little to no meaning to the list of endangered life within the ESA program.\u201d Do you support the premise of the Endangered Species Act? I do. What I don\u02bct support is misuse of the act, and misuse of science for a policy agenda. Aquarium hobbyists are encouraged to submit their written commentary to NOAA. - Julian Sprung Download or View Julian Sprung\u2019s public commentary as submitted. PIJAC\u2019s recommendations on how and what to submit -\u00a0US NOAA Coral Species Listing"},{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#webpage"},"author":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/author/Reef-To-Rainforest/#author","name":"Reef To Rainforest"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/#organization"},"headline":"Julian Sprung\u2019s NOAA / ESA Commentary","datePublished":"2013-04-08T14:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-10T22:47:17+00:00","commentCount":0,"mainEntityOfPage":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#webpage","image":{"@id":"https://reefs.com/2013/04/08/julian-sprungs-noaa-esa-commentary/#primaryimage"},"keywords":"endangered corals,julian,king,NOAA,Opinion,policy,science","articleSection":"Conservation,Corals,Fish,Industry,Opinion"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://reefs.com/author/Reef-To-Rainforest/#author","name":"Reef To Rainforest","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https://reefs.com/#personlogo","url":"https://cdn.reefs.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/reefs-com-100x100.png","caption":"Reef To Rainforest"},"sameAs":[]}]}

Julian Sprung’s NOAA / ESA Commentary

AvatarBy Reef To Rainforest 6 years ago
Home  /  Conservation  /  Julian Sprung’s NOAA / ESA Commentary
ORA red goni

credit: Matt Pederson

 11:59 PM EST April 5th, 2013 has passed and Regulations.gov appears to still be accepting public commentary, so you have another 11 hours or so to say your piece online.  [Update, comment period has now closed, you can view the document and public commentary here] In light of this one last chance, Julian Sprung, well-known author, MASNA Aquarist of the Year, founder of Two Little Fishies, and a member of the CORAL Sr. Advisory Board, shares his opinions on why failing to speak up isn’t an option.  MORE: Julian Sprung’s NOAA/ESA Commentary

Categories:
  Conservation, Corals, Fish, Industry, Opinion
Avatar
About

 Reef To Rainforest

  (4 articles)

this post was shared 0 times
 000