You own a reef aquarium. You’re not a conservationist.

Jeremy GosnellBy Jeremy Gosnell 4 years ago
Home  /  Science  /  You own a reef aquarium. You’re not a conservationist.

1608I’ve been following a lively debate on one of the web’s many reef keeping blogs. It revolves around a series of posts regarding the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA and legislation that places corals on the Endangered Species Act. First, I understand that these issues are near and dear to many reefers’ hearts, mine included. Many of us are worried that our hobby will change, become heavily regulated and that certain coral species will be illegal to keep. Personally, in a worst case scenario, I don’t think pending legislation will impact the hobby to the point suggested by many. I do believe that if our industry doesn’t change fundamentally, the future could involve regulation that prohibits certain reef aquarium related actions. Most of the reef keepers I’ve spoken with, along with most of the replies I’ve read are viewing this issue through the narrow lens of reef keeping. In order to understand the larger picture, you need to take your position as a reef aquarist out of the equation.  For centuries human beings have slaughtered animals, destroying individual species and entire ecosystems. In the uncontrolled expansion of capitalism, we’ve destroyed habitat and put a price tag on individual species. In 1973 the Endangered Species Act was signed into law by Richard Nixon, for the very purpose of protecting critically endangered species from extinction, as the result of untampered economic and development related actions, that didn’t take conservation into account. The ESA states its primary goal as: Halting and reversing the trend of animal extinction, at whatever the cost. Both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration enforce the ESA. endangered-species-actIf a petition is submitted that suggests a species is imperiled, then a review process begins that may end in said species being listed on the ESA. As we recall, the original petition surrounding corals was initially for up to 62 species. Science provided by Pet Industry Joint Council (PIJAC) has lowered the listed amount to 20 species, all considered threatened. The ESA’s goal is pretty easily explained, to halt and reverse extinction at whatever the cost. This means, that if NMFS believes that ending the sale and husbandry of certain coral species will aid in reversing the trend of extinction, then they will do it, without much focus on what reef aquarists, industries, etc feel, think or believe. Could science that suggests these animals are not endangered persuade them, yes it could, as we saw with PIJAC’s findings. macpherson_5Where I think aquarists are making a critical misjudgment, is when they consider the reef aquarium hobby a mode of conservation. When examples like Walt Smith International are used as examples of conservation, it shows a severe rift in thinking. The words harvest and conservation are not interchangeable and frankly they don’t interact at all. Harvesting is taking something and in the case of the reef aquarium industry, profiting from it. Conservation is identifying something of ecological importance, determining stressors that are destroying it and protecting it by any means possible. Where confusion arises is that both the hobby and conservation involve similar processes. Both employ science, both are methodical and in the case of coral, both are centered on one group of animals. Let me be clear, being a reef aquarist is in no way shape or form, being a coral reef conservationist. When Walt Smith transplants corals on Fijian reefs, he isn’t conserving anything. He is simply replacing what he has taken. It’s the same mentality as cutting a pine tree to decorate for Christmas, but planting a sapling to take its place. If you were conserving the species of pine, you wouldn’t cut it in the first place. coral-reefs-2011Even if we buy corals from the most sustainable vendors and wholesalers on the planet, we are not contributing to conservation. Even if we visit local schools and aid them in setting up a reef, we are not contributing to conservation. When we allow children to come over to our homes and view our reefs, attempting to foster appreciation of ocean animals within them, we are not contributing to conservation. When Sea Shepherd wraps a prop fowler around a Japanese whaling boat, forcing the boat to a dead stop, preventing it from killing a Minke Whale, they are contributing to conservation. When Greenpeace exposes the illegal activities of the fishing industry to the U.N., resulting in enhanced protection for various species, they are contributing to conservation. When scientists unlock the secrets to coral microbes, which can enhance gene transfer and help corals adapt to climate change, they are contributing to conservation. When legislators sign laws that create areas of protected oceanic ecosystems and create a body to enforce that status, they are contributing to conservation. As aquarists we can strive to be sustainable, meaning that we aren’t taking so much of a resource that we deplete it – but being a reef aquarist alone does nothing for conservation. In fact, it actively works against it. Aquarists all over the internet are priding themselves as conservationists. It’s a very false sense of pride. The majority of reef aquarists (the 90% of the iceberg Rich Ross was referring to) wouldn’t know reef conservation if it slapped them in the face, because if they did, they wouldn’t have a reef aquarium. The NMFS doesn’t care how many children have seen your tank. They don’t care how many “presentations” you’ve given. They don’t care that your Uncle Ed and Aunt Marge love staring at your corals. They care that science has shown that 20 species of corals are threatened due to commerce activity and that trend needs halted and reversed, by any means possible. It really is that simple. coralWhen I do business with sustainable vendors, propagate corals and give them to fellow hobbyists, use the grey water created by my RODI unit for another purpose, discard waste water in an environmentally safe manner, I am not doing anything to conserve coral reefs. I am not having an impact on the environment as severe as those who are careless and wasteful, but I’m not conserving anything. When I worked for the Beautiful Oceans Academy out of Montreal, GPS mapping coral reefs aiding in science to measure their decline and helping experts implement strategies to protect them, I was contributing to conservation. When I taught responsible, reef friendly diving through the same organization, I was teaching sustainability. No matter how you spin it, dress it up and make it sexy, reef aquarists are taking from the environment. Sure, we may love corals, we may know more about them than the average joe but the reality is that corals belong on reefs around the world, serving their ecological duties, not in glass boxes in our basements and living rooms. The industry is struggling to lessen its ecological footprint and certainly doesn’t have a plan to give something back to the reef, that hasn’t already been taken. Shoving these delicate animals into Fed Ex and UPS boxes and shipping them all over the country, all year long, has created a chain of dead animals that is immeasurable. The use of cyanide to collect marine fish, along with other actions of the aquarium industry, has destroyed tracts of precious ecological heritage. Whenever you use the laws of supply and demand to harvest and sell something, turning a profit, conservation is often thrown right out the window. Reef aquarists all over the internet have defended this hobby, it’s pricing and practices with one breath and called themselves conservationists in another. o-CORAL-REEF-TIME-LAPSE-facebookMany of us know right from wrong and realize that many wheels of commerce are not right in their current form. Even the best of us are a far cry from conservationists. NMFS knows that. We can either shape the industry into something that respects the environment, or year after year watch as more and more reef animals become threatened. The argument that reef aquariums aren’t a stressor to oceanic ecosystems is stale and irrelevant. I recently received emails from former large chain personnel regarding the fate of much marine life imported and sold there. It’s depressing and highlights this industries’ need for change. A basic start is realizing the difference between conservation, abusive harvest and sustainability. The latter is the toughest to achieve and as it stands today, the reef aquarium industry falls in the center. It’s vital that we focus on what reef keeping is doing right, correct the environmental injustices that may take place, educate each other and stop pretending that our hobby is something that it isn’t. To put in perspective just off how base aquarists are, bringing the hobby into the realm of conservation, CORAL the coral reef alliance actually issued a call to action regarding the collection of corals for marine aquaria.

Category:
  Science
Jeremy Gosnell
About

 Jeremy Gosnell

  (127 articles)

Jeremy Gosnell has been an aquarist for nearly all of his life. While studying sociology in college, he began writing for Freshwater and Marine Aquarium Magazine, moving over to Fish Channel and Aquarium Fish International in 2005. In 2008 he began composing feature articles for Tropical Fish Hobbyist Magazine, and today serves as TFH's monthly saltwater Q&A writer, and is a member of the peer review content editorial board. After becoming a PADI certified dive master and specialty instructor, Jeremy trained with the Beautiful Oceans Academy as a science diver, specializing in coral reef biology, ecosystems and food chain hierarchies. He worked with Beautiful Oceans to promote scientific diving and underwater GPS coral reef mapping and bio-diversity studies for both scientific study and recreational dive charters. He holds various scuba related certifications including PADI master scuba diver, dive master, specialty instructor, DAN dive emergency specialist, marine wildlife injury specialist and several TECH REC technical certifications, including deep water diving, re-breather diving and cave diving. In his spare time Jeremy is a science fiction writer, and his debut novel Neptune's Garden was released in 2010. His second novel is being released later in 2015. Both books are oceanic in nature, exploring the existence of the mythical kingdom of Atlantis, from a scientific viewpoint.

3 Comments

  • Alex says:

    I agree in principle with your assessment, but especially the last link might be a bit out of proportion. I mean scleractinians are covered by CITES anyway and the weight exported for the reef hobby is nothing compared to what’s being used in construction work or destroyed in other ways. I do believe that to conserve anything the people in the countries where our corals come from need to first start seeing them as a valuable resource, something that’s too valuable to use in construction etc. And that’s one area where our hobby can shine: $$$ might be a better motivator to preserve than education in countries that have a historically terrible culture regarding animal rights and conservation.

    As for hobbyists not being conservationists: there are several freshwater species that only exist in captivity anymore: hobbyists keep them alive in great numbers – agreed, that’s not what I wish for corals, but it is a repository of specimens larger than public aquariums/zoos etc. could conceivably amass.

    Last but not least: if banning the trade helps a species then we should of course bite the bullet and ban it, but I am not sure the numbers back that approach.

    • Jeremy Gosnell Jeremy Gosnell says:

      Alex,

      The article was directed at aquarists who have a misconception of the hobby as conservation. When you read the mission statements of various reef conservation outlets (private and public funded) the harvest of reef organisms for trade and sale isn’t part of the plan. It seems to me that some reef keepers believe owning a reef aquarium is somehow contributing to reef conservation. While it may enhance our knowledge of coral animals and their ideal environmental parameters, it isn’t doing anything to conserve wild reefs. The link I provided was simply to illustrate that conservation outlets flag reef aquarium collection as a potential degrading factor in reef health. It’s vital that collectors are paid enough that harvesting reef organisms can serve as a sole source of income. From what I’ve researched, in many regions they are paid so little for reef livestock that they continue to harvest animals for the seafood industry and textiles for construction. In this case, the reef aquarium industry isn’t having the effect it could, in teaching sustainable collection and providing economic stimulus to often poor island regions. If you research conservation, having a species exist only in captivity isn’t actually a goal, but a tremendous failure on part of species protection. There are species that only exist in captivity, but the goal of conservation is keeping species in their natural habitat, serving their ecological roles in numbers great enough to preserve them for generations. Honestly, I don’t think we have an accurate data based picture on what an outright ban would do. It’s possible that black market activity would increase, it’s possible that island nations would shift resources away from livestock collection into more ecologically harmful practices and there are other possible bad consequences of a ban. Traditionally trade bans do decrease overall harvest of species they are placed upon. This post was to address aquarists who I’ve had dialogue with, saying that they have contacted NMFS to tell them how reef aquarists are active conservationists, simply by owning a reef aquarium. Something that is simply not the case.

  • fusedjaw says:

    I abs

this post was shared 0 times
 000