Product Review: Nipple Nonsense

by | Jan 15, 2002 | 0 comments

A great deal of angst, concern, and confusion has been created by recent reports that the orientation of the “nipple” of a metal halide can have a significant impact on the performance of a metal halide bulb. Significant declines in intensity, apparent color shifts, and even the failure to light have been attributed to the position of the nipple. Unfortunately, these reports have been based on anecdotal observation and until now not investigated through systematic testing. In an effort to resolve the many questions regarding the relationship between nipple orientation and metal halide bulb performance, I completed a series of tests to evaluate several assertions made regarding bulb orientation.

The assertion perpetuated with greatest frequency is that the intensity of a metal halide bulb is lowest on the side of the bulb with the nipple. The nipple is a small disc of glass on the outside of the inner envelope of a metal halide bulb created when the metal halide bulb is manufactured (figure 1). It is left as the inner envelope is sealed off after being filled with gases. The size and location of the nipple varies with different metal halide bulbs. It can range from as little as one-sixteenth of an inch (3mm) with German bulbs, to nearly one-eighth of an inch (6mm) with Japanese bulbs, and even larger with some American metal halide bulbs. To put this into perspective, the visible portion of a typical metal halide inner envelope is about 1.5 inches or 37mm. In other words, the nipple covers less than 10% of the length of the inner envelope.


Measuring the impact of nipple location is not a simple task. At the close distances that hobbyists typically place their bulbs over a reef tank, a small change in distance can have a significant impact on intensity. To draw valid conclusions regarding variations in intensity, distances between the bulb and light sensor need to maintained within a fraction of an inch. Maintaining these tolerances while measuring light intensity in 360 degrees cannot be done by hand. Consequently I developed a experimental design that makes use of equipment normally used in professional panoramic photography. The key component consists of a tripod with a rotating head calibrated in degrees with three geared controls that enable one to make fine adjustments in the X, Y, and Z axes. Using these controls, I was able to place the long axis of the metal halide bulb in the exact center of a rotating turntable enabling me to maintain a constant distance between the bulb and the sensor as it rotates. With this arrangement, the distance between bulb and sensor could be held to less than one-sixteenth of an inch (less than 3mm) while rotating the bulb through 360 degrees. A Li-Cor 2pi quantum sensor connected to a Li-Cor L1000 data logger was mounted 24 inches from the bulb to approximate light levels at the bottom of a typical reef tank and. The center of the sensor was placed in line with the nipple, which is generally at the center of the inner envelope. I recorded photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) every 45 degrees through 360 degrees of rotation with the data logger averaging 60 separate measurements at each point. To evaluate color temperature, I used a Gossen Color-Pro color meter.

For reasons that will be explained below, the glowing arc of each metal halide was photographed through a high density “solar filter” normally used in astronomy to photograph the sun. The majority of measurements were taken with the bulb in a base down vertical position. This is because it proved to be the most reliable replicable set up. However, measurements and arc photographs were also taken with bulbs in the horizontal position. To do this the sensor was left in the same position while the bulb was switched to a horizontal position and rotated as if on a rotisserie. Since the bulb was continually lighted during the rotation and measurement, one concern was that measurements might vary if the bulbs were fired in different orientations. To test this possibility, a second set of measurements and photographs were taken with the bulbs switched off between reorientations. No differences were observed.

A total of four different 400 watt bulbs were evaluated, two Iwasaki bulbs, a German 10,000 degree Kelvin bulb, and a Radium 20,000 degree Kelvin bulb, also from Germany. I tested the Iwasaki MT400DL/BUD version as well as the MT400DL/BH version. The difference between the two versions is that the BUD bulb is designed for mounting in a vertical or pendant arrangement. The BH version is designed for horizontal mounting. The ballast used for PAR measurements was a standard 400 watt core and coil metal halide ballast, although I also photographed the 10,000 and 20,000 degree bulbs using a 400 watt HQI ballast.


The distribution of light around some bulb circumferences did vary. However, the variation was not consistent from brand to brand and the nipple position was not an accurate predictor of intensity. Some bulbs produced greater intensity on the side with the nipple while others produced greater intensity on the side opposite the nipple. The polar graphs reproduced below for each of the bulbs shows intensity in PAR. The orientation of the graph is from the top of the bulb looking towards the bulb base with the nipple at 0 degrees. The line represents the PAR in uE/m^2/sec. In the case of the two Iwasaki bulbs, the highest intensity in the vertical (pendant) orientation was radiated on the side of the bulb with the nipple. This was true for both the BUD and the BH versions of the bulb.

However, there was a significant difference in the extent of the asymmetry  between the two versions. While the BUD version only varied 13% from side to side, the BH version operated in the vertical position varied 39% from side to side. In other words, the bulb operated improperly produces a light field that is significantly more asymmetrical than the Iwasaki, when operated as designed. Measured in a horizontal orientation, the same Iwasaki BH bulb that differed by 39% from side to side in a vertical orientation varied no more than 5% at any point.

Similar in light distribution to the Iwasaki bulb, the German 10,000 degree Kelvin bulb produced more light from the side with the nipple than the opposite side. However, neither orientation produced as much light as either side at 90 and 270 degrees from the nipple. The German 20,000 degree Kelvin bulb generated quite a different light field with the lowest light levels generated at 90 and 270 degree, just the opposite of the 10,000 degree Kelvin bulb.

Color temperature of the bulbs varied less than intensity. The Iwasaki bulbs varied from 6450 Kelvin at 0 degrees (towards the nipple) to 6090 K at 180 degrees opposite the nipple. The German 10,000 degree Kelvin bulb ranged from 23,250 degree Kelvin 90 degrees from the nipple to 21,270 degree Kelvin in the direction of the nipple. The Radium bulb’s color temperature is beyond the 40,000 degree Kelvin range of the color meter.














Discussion and Recommendations





























The results make it clear that one cannot state categorically that light intensity is lower on the side of the bulb with the nipple. Quite the contrary, on the whole, light intensity tends to be greater on the side with the nipple. Much more is at work here than simply nipple orientation. An examination of the inner envelope and glowing arc within the envelope explains the differences. The orientation of the arc within the inner envelope has a much greater impact on light intensity than the glass nipple. In a vertical orientation, the Iwasaki bulb arc arches towards the nipple and consequently produces more light on the side with the nipple. This is true for both the BUD and BH versions, but is more pronounced with the BH version burned in a vertical orientation. In contrast, the German 20,000 degree Kelvin bulb arc arches away from the nipple and therefore produces greater light opposite the nipple. The 10,000 degree Kelvin bulb produces the most uniform and centered arc of the bulbs evaluated. However, the arc tends to be diffused and somewhat oblong in shape, not cylindrical like the other bulbs and produces significantly less light along the narrow portion of the arc and greater light on the broad sides of the arc.

Of the bulbs tested, the most uniform light distribution measured is produced by the Iwasaki BH bulb operated horizontally. This is somewhat misleading, however. The two photographs of the Iwasaki bulb operated horizontally show that the bulb arc follows along the top of the envelope regardless of nipple orientation. Since the sensor was in a fixed position and the bulb rotated, the position of the arc relative to the sensor remained constant. This would have been true regardless of the placement of the sensor. However, had the bulb remained fixed and the sensor rotated, light levels would have also varied in the horizontal position, but probably less so than they did in the vertical orientation.

Mounted horizontally in a typical canopy, metal halide bulbs produce the highest intensity at the top of the bulb, regardless of the position of the nipple. This can be seen in the horizontal photos where the arc can be seen clearly closer to the top of the envelope regardless of the bulb and regardless of the orientation of the nipple. One thought is that convection currents distort the arc. Regardless of the reason, mounted either horizontally or vertically, the position of the arc is determined by physics and the design of the bulb, not the placement of the nipple.

The arch of the arc towards the top of the envelope means that when horizontally mounted over a tank, the greatest intensity of light will be directed into the fixture’s reflector instead of directly into the tank. At first glance this may seem to be inefficient use of the brightest light, but quite the contrary, this is fortuitous. Most hobbyists want to light as much of the tank as possible. A metal halide bulb is a quasi-point source of light and therefore alone creates a great deal of light directly below the bulb and much less light further away from the bulb. The reflector effectively spreads the light creating more even light across the tank than the bulb alone could create. Projecting the greatest amount of light into the reflector better evens out the light field.

How does one explain the anecdotal observations such as bulbs failing to fire if the nipple is mis-positioned? First, a reef tank is a hostile environment for any electrical device, particularly one that draws a great deal of current. Corrosion can build up in the contacts and sockets of metal halide lighting. In the course of trying to reorient the nipple of a metal halide bulb, one must remove the bulb and by doing so may remove the corrosion that was preventing the bulb from firing. I have found that with an older metal halide bulb, simply unscrewing and screwing the bulb back in will enable the bulb to fire. Those who have observed a color shift when changing the orientation of the nipple may also be inadvertently cleaning the corrosion from the bulb contacts while attempting to reorient the bulb. There is a very small color temperature shift at different points around the bulb. It is possible that the small color temperature difference is more apparent when the bulb is placed next to a second bulb with a different color temperature. This would be most apparent as a bulb ages and shifts in color. In these experiments I was unable to significantly shift the color temperature of any bulb by rotating the position, but I have observed color shifts in older unstable metal halide bulbs where the arc periodically changes position. One should realize, however, that the nipple has nothing to do with the position of the arc within the envelope, and that the nipple has nothing to do with color shift.

My conclusion is that the concern over nipple orientation is misplaced. The nipple itself has little to do with the performance of metal halide bulbs including intensity or color temperature. Each metal halide design creates a different arc of light within the envelope and it is this characteristic that creates asymmetrical light fields. While light intensity varies somewhat with the orientation of the bulb, the use of efficient reflectors can minimize any asymmetry. The orientation of a metal halide nipple has far less impact on light over a reef tank than the choice of bulb, quality of reflectors, and keeping the bulb free of salt deposits and dirt. It is also important for Iwasaki bulb users to choose the proper bulb for their application, the BUD version for pendant users and the BH version for horizontal mounting.

Note: When it comes to the apparent difference with the 20K arc colors these differences might be interpreted as caused by the glass nipple, but in fact that difference resulted because I had to photograph the 20K vertical arc through welder’s glass, because the Solar filter made the photograph too dim.

One final note. One should never attempt to look into a lighted metal halide bulb without proper eye protection. All the cautions regarding the viewing of solar eclipses apply to viewing metal halide bulbs as well. Using welder’s glass is the minimum protection that one should use and solar filters sold by astronomy supply stores are an even safer choice.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *