This is a very interesting study by Elizabeth Clarke. I remember touring her rotifer and phytoplankton labs a while back. It points out very well that the culture of promising larval food organisms is just beginning. I think that there is more to the situation than just successful culture, however. When we were working with the large angels i the late 70s, it became evident very quickly that rotifers, for whatever reason, just were not on the menu for larval angelfish. So we turned to wild plankton, mostly copepods. When this was successful we tried to culture copepods in large outdoor tanks. And this was also successful. The tanks were 30 feet long, 15 feet wide and 20 inches deep. A good green water culture was easy to develop and the copepods were abundant. The only fly in the ointment was that the larval angels would consume the copepod napuli and copopodites but, for whatever reason, would not survive at that time under the existing conditions. Larva from the same hatch, however, would suvive on wild plankton. So there may be some problems that must be corrected in culture systems for copepods and other organisms to produce a food organism that not only has the proper size and behavior, but also has the nutritional and "nontoxic" characteristics to allow survival of the larvae. Syd Kraul also had problems along these lines and found that he had to sterilize and restart his copepod cultures every 3 days to produce a food organism that would allow survival. So if one is interested in production over research, then wild plankton is the way to go.