Kevin Gaines no longer at ORA??;
- Thread starter spawner
- Start date
I'm not trying to spread rumors, but I heard that his departure was not self promotion. If that is indeed the case, my question then is why would ORA get rid of such talent? It's easy enough to read between the lines, though.
Best of luck to you, Kevin! You're a class act.
Best of luck to you, Kevin! You're a class act.
Rascal":37r8u9s5 said:
It's too bad that this board is so strongly censored, because otherwise you could say what you wanted to say.
Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
[email protected]
OK I gotta ask. Are you the same Wayne that would perch high up on a pedestal in the AOL Fish chat room and spout all sorts of garbage, getting all over anyone that disagreed with you or you thought might know more than you? This was several years back and I mean several. For some reason the name is sticking and the way you've been on here reminds me of that dude over there. If I remember correctly that Wayne also had some kid hdhoag tout all Waynes praises and agree with everything said to make it look like he knew what he was saying?
I can't imagine what kind of sheltered life you live if you really think this board is so strongly censored. I am thankful this board exists and it's as laid back as it is especially when I see the other options....over there. I only wish this board had comparable traffic because if it did it would surely be number one.
I can't imagine what kind of sheltered life you live if you really think this board is so strongly censored. I am thankful this board exists and it's as laid back as it is especially when I see the other options....over there. I only wish this board had comparable traffic because if it did it would surely be number one.
JustPhish":262fx8fa said:
:lol: Nope not me.
You can find me on rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
If you want to see me on an uncensored message board, read rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
[email protected]
Nah I call shenanigans. Had to be you. I think the name was even wsallee or something. Man this was sooo long ago but I think I got you pegged.
I used to peruse that board frequently. Can't say I ever thought of it as a place to go to get trusted information. Why bother coming here if you're so censored I wonder?
I used to peruse that board frequently. Can't say I ever thought of it as a place to go to get trusted information. Why bother coming here if you're so censored I wonder?
JustPhish":2rtdoxpv said:
:lol: Wanting less censorship, is the opposite of sheltering :lol:
Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
[email protected]
JustPhish":33zuc8b8 said:
First you are saying chat room and now you are saying board.
I used to be on an AOL message board, but that was many many years ago back when Steve case was CEO, back before aol bought out Compuserve. That was way back, and my attitude was not as you are saying.
But if you want to see me on an uncensored board, read rec.aquaria.marine.reefs. I've been on that back farther than google even goes. In fact Back in the earlier days of rec.aquaria.marine.reefs posting, Google did not exist, and Deja news did all the searching of newsgroups and then sold all that to Google. The owner of Deja news even posted some on rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
[email protected]
Yes I was talking about a chat room. Then you brought up the rec.aquaria board so my next post I spoke about the board. Is it really that confusing? I haven't changed my answers at all.
I am aware of the rec boards and like I said, not exactly a place I thought of when I was looking for trusted information. I was there many years ago and stopped visiting the board once Deja stopped doing it. I can't see going back either. I've got my fill of you here. If this is the way you play (some of your more recent posts...just so you don't get confused again) when asked nicely why would I bother to seek you out elsewhere?
I am aware of the rec boards and like I said, not exactly a place I thought of when I was looking for trusted information. I was there many years ago and stopped visiting the board once Deja stopped doing it. I can't see going back either. I've got my fill of you here. If this is the way you play (some of your more recent posts...just so you don't get confused again) when asked nicely why would I bother to seek you out elsewhere?
WayneSallee":1w7bvitp said:
er-the only point made about any censorship is that posts must be kept civil and constructive
it seems as if you do not 'get' it, and are carrying a grudge because you're taking it personally-i do not know if this is the case, but continually harping on about it does nothing at all for you or anyone else, and will NOT change anything, heh
nothing is preventing anyone from saying anything they want about the industry, or who goes where to where and why
though i suppose posting pure speculation is simply in poor taste
Holy moly 8O
OK. The 1st one. That's what the dude in the room was doing. You have a different, more "constructive" way to explain what someone was doing? It was what it was and I said as much.
Second one. It's a statement! I don't see the problem with it. I can't imagine how sheltered a life one has to have lived to think that what happens on this board is censorship.
Third. It's a legitimate question. I'm curious why someone who believes they are being censored would continue to visit the place. Only to keep complaining? How else should I have asked if I wanted to know. Now I'm curious about that.
Fourth...finally. Another statement. I didn't realize "civil" and "constructive" was a synonym for "candy coat". Suddenly there's no way to be critical in a civil way?
I didn't call names. I didn't make innuendos. I didn't make ludicrous claims with no way to back them up. I didn't start a conspiracy theory. I didn't accuse anyone of doing something illegal...again with no basis.
I don't know. I just don't see it. Maybe the dude is right afterall. At the risk of being uncivil and deconstructive, I have to say...after seeing all the other stuff that flies on this board I had absolutely no idea I was dealing with such fragile egos. Who'da thunk it?
OK. The 1st one. That's what the dude in the room was doing. You have a different, more "constructive" way to explain what someone was doing? It was what it was and I said as much.
Second one. It's a statement! I don't see the problem with it. I can't imagine how sheltered a life one has to have lived to think that what happens on this board is censorship.
Third. It's a legitimate question. I'm curious why someone who believes they are being censored would continue to visit the place. Only to keep complaining? How else should I have asked if I wanted to know. Now I'm curious about that.
Fourth...finally. Another statement. I didn't realize "civil" and "constructive" was a synonym for "candy coat". Suddenly there's no way to be critical in a civil way?
I didn't call names. I didn't make innuendos. I didn't make ludicrous claims with no way to back them up. I didn't start a conspiracy theory. I didn't accuse anyone of doing something illegal...again with no basis.
I don't know. I just don't see it. Maybe the dude is right afterall. At the risk of being uncivil and deconstructive, I have to say...after seeing all the other stuff that flies on this board I had absolutely no idea I was dealing with such fragile egos. Who'da thunk it?
Sponsor Reefs
We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.
Click here to sponsor $10:
