dreko said:Paul,
lighten up :wink1:
So how about answering a simple question? No need to 'read' into it!
Indulge me
aaron23 said:Again i've told you he did not go into specifics as to HOW IN DETAIL the nitrates are beneficial in coral growth. You had to be there i dont really want to explain his conference.
aaron23 said:Marubini, F., and P.S. Davies. 1996. Nitrate increases zooxanthellae population density and reduces skeletogenesis in corals. Mar Biol 127: 319-28.
aaron23 said:ok bad example i have no example others will fend for me that heard the same thing.
i just did a google and read parts where it read nitrate.
aaron23 said:too tired i drove 5 hours in a total of 48 hours. In those 48 hours i slept 8.
aaron23 said:ok bad example lol i have no example others will fend for me that heard the same thing.
i just did a google and read parts where it read nitrate.
thats what i said before i have no example heard it from the conference. Stop pestering me asking me about examples and specific details i dont ahve them for you and you're asking the wrong person merely stating the observation heard from a professional.
aaron23 said:There's no such thing as getting the right bacteria in the tank. how do you get a certain strain of bacteria in your tank.
..... basically the problem with bb is that there is very little to no denitrification. I really dont think bacteria will play a role in the aquarium because of the constant siphoning and skimming along with no sand.
aaron23 said:Blasting the corals with uniform light is not true. Reffering to Tullio at the conference his LED's were 1 watt each. Having 400 w bulbs is not the answer with blasting corals with hella light. There are specific spectrums which coral require for growth. These bulbs which we use are not made specifically for coral growth and are only for pleasing the eye. Its the type of spectrum and par that the bulb must let out. It's not stronger the better. NONE OF THESE halide bulbs are specifically for the use in the aquaria. The only proven bulb of readings such as kelvin are 10k. anything above 10k is merely a guess on its rating.
aaron23 said:Directly feeding the corals is definitely not required or necessary. The fish poo is all the corals need.
sci33 said:I believe Sprung was making a reference to the corals using trace amounts of nitrates and phosphates in their growth processes. Although he didn't say whether this comment was directed towards any specific coral, he was speaking about corals in general. Regardless of this mention to a coral's traits, high nitrates and phosphates will still be unhealthy for sps while clams may be more tolerant due to their nitrate consumption. If anyone was at NERAC and heard Sprung's full comments maybe you can clarify this for us.
Besides the right bacteria you need the right microenvironments for the bacteria to perform the function that you want them to do.kimoyo said:I think we need to get the right amount of the right bacteria in our tanks. Anyway, I hope you guys are down to have a good discussion this week.
solbby said:Besides the right bacteria you need the right microenvironments for the bacteria to perform the function that you want them to do.
solbby said:Paul are you thinking about supplementing with bacteria, like zeobak?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6629199#post6629199 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by iwan
The bacteria's increases if you dose Vodka in the aquarium.
However, it is the problem that the increase isn't selective.
Populations increase at random.