- Location
- Duluth, Minnesota
That is a fairly good assessment but has some errors that he is not familiar with. His table is off, as for when you are trying to give real CO2 levels you have to use the real pH of seawater, which we do not use, nor does his table. There are 3 pH scales for seawater, ie, pH-nbs, pH-t and pH-sws. We use pH-nbs which gives pH levels that are ~ 0.15 pH to high. Nothing you guys need to worry about. We often tell you guys the pH of seawater is around 8.3, what you look for on your meter but the real pH is ~ 8.15. Even seawater text books use to give the pH-nbs, till just recently. With this ^ said DO NOT race off telling people your pH is wrong and you need to fix it. We have already fixed it for you by telling you NSW pH is 8.3. So, you subtract that 0.15 from 8.3 and you get what NSW @ 8.15 real pH, same pH.
Also, the remark on calcium carbonate dissolving is so low it can not even be measured. So, there is no sense in mentioning it. It is pretty much a myth the sand dissolves, been proven many times it does not.
Also, as I already stated, CO2 has nil effect on Alk and can be proven. He also makes no mention of the real issue with low pH for many, high room air CO2.
He is writing is good stuff but does not really fully understand what he is saying. Meaning, he is saying low pH is only a photosynthesis issue between day and night. He has no mention of high room air CO2. As far as day and night fluctuations in your tank, well, many do not realize this but reefs also have day and night fluctuations in pH.
This what I mean by is error in the table
If it were 7.7, then your tank would have 5.3 times the CO2 of NSW
At his dKH of 9.8 and his 1:1 pH 8.3
CO2 = .58, pH 8.3, Alk 9.8 dKH
CO2 = 2.83, pH 7.7, Alk 9.8 dKH
2.83 / .58 = 4.88 x, NOT 5.3 x as his table shows.
And that .58 and 2.83 = 0.58 ppm CO2 and 2.83 ppm CO2
But the guy means good he us just off target. With the errors fixed it would be a nice piece. This always happens when one uses freshwater std / measurements and you are dealing with seawater.
Your comment
I would like to make an experiment to set up a new fish tank, with less fish and corals. To see if theres any difference in the PH in the same room. Do you think there will be a difference ?!. Thank You.
Yes, it may, depending on the amount of CO2 being generated in the high density tank vs the low density tank. CO2 enters water very easily but is harder to remove. Equilibrium with the air is not instant. You can generated CO2 in the tank faster than it can be removed = low pH, common in high density fish tanks. Heavily planted tanks can remove CO2 faster than it enters the tank from the air = high pH, why they add CO2 to lowers pH
If one does allot of water changes and you have no or very littler high room air CO2 the tank will be more stable. A friend of mine does a 100 % WC every 2 weeks but the salt and water are FREE.
The real issue with most reefers is for some odd reason they like to chase numbers. People need to learn if you are within the excepted range of parameters leave the dam tank alone. Meaning, some guy has to have his dKH @ 10 and 9.8 is just wrong in his mind.
Also, the remark on calcium carbonate dissolving is so low it can not even be measured. So, there is no sense in mentioning it. It is pretty much a myth the sand dissolves, been proven many times it does not.
Also, as I already stated, CO2 has nil effect on Alk and can be proven. He also makes no mention of the real issue with low pH for many, high room air CO2.
He is writing is good stuff but does not really fully understand what he is saying. Meaning, he is saying low pH is only a photosynthesis issue between day and night. He has no mention of high room air CO2. As far as day and night fluctuations in your tank, well, many do not realize this but reefs also have day and night fluctuations in pH.
This what I mean by is error in the table
If it were 7.7, then your tank would have 5.3 times the CO2 of NSW
At his dKH of 9.8 and his 1:1 pH 8.3
CO2 = .58, pH 8.3, Alk 9.8 dKH
CO2 = 2.83, pH 7.7, Alk 9.8 dKH
2.83 / .58 = 4.88 x, NOT 5.3 x as his table shows.
And that .58 and 2.83 = 0.58 ppm CO2 and 2.83 ppm CO2
But the guy means good he us just off target. With the errors fixed it would be a nice piece. This always happens when one uses freshwater std / measurements and you are dealing with seawater.
Your comment
I would like to make an experiment to set up a new fish tank, with less fish and corals. To see if theres any difference in the PH in the same room. Do you think there will be a difference ?!. Thank You.
Yes, it may, depending on the amount of CO2 being generated in the high density tank vs the low density tank. CO2 enters water very easily but is harder to remove. Equilibrium with the air is not instant. You can generated CO2 in the tank faster than it can be removed = low pH, common in high density fish tanks. Heavily planted tanks can remove CO2 faster than it enters the tank from the air = high pH, why they add CO2 to lowers pH
If one does allot of water changes and you have no or very littler high room air CO2 the tank will be more stable. A friend of mine does a 100 % WC every 2 weeks but the salt and water are FREE.
The real issue with most reefers is for some odd reason they like to chase numbers. People need to learn if you are within the excepted range of parameters leave the dam tank alone. Meaning, some guy has to have his dKH @ 10 and 9.8 is just wrong in his mind.
Last edited: