A
Anonymous
Guest
beaslbob":1pzu0cl4 said:vitz":1pzu0cl4 said:...
man, i've yet to see someone as relatively clueless about the loads of terrible advice and misinformation they give out as you are.
your info is not correct, incomplete at best, and is going to put anyone in the position of actually, and mistakenly, folllowing it ,in a potentially disastrous situation
i'd suggest you do some research on fish metabolism, and metabolic rates, in addition to getting a clue or three :roll:
I think we both have shared ideas. I have researched this and it is my experience setting up over a dozen Fw planted tanks in 1/2 dozen cities in the US. From my perspective you simply have not used these methods. Like I stated before, with food the first fish during the first week, that fish does die just like clockwork.
Additionally, with peaceful fish I have left the tanks alone while outta town on work numerous times for two weeks and once for three weeks and experienced no losses. So the system must be balanced out enough the fish are getting some food.
There was an old book out of print something like "the optimum aquarium" which recommended not feeding the first fish for three weeks. Plus the step by step above was from several freshwater and marine aquariums articles on the late 70's and early 80's. If any research is needed you might look up those sources.
Meanwhile, the newbie will experience exactly what I went through. There may be other ways, but I am absolutely sure these experiences are accurate and recommended by other authorities. They result in extremely low maintenance systems that are very stable and forgiving of newbie mistakes. And have been implemented by other new hobbiests over the years with the same results.
ah thanx
now i understand more clearly
so you don't independently check your 'sources' for veracity, or accuracy, and just accept them as gospel?
what if the book was WRONG??!! (as it was)
there's TONS of 'facts' from 'authorities' that are not indeed factual, and the recommendation from the out of print book you quote is one of them
one of your major problems is that you attribute cause and effect relationships based on a one time anecdotal observation
do you know what a fw fish's metabolic/energy requirements are ? how often it's best to feed them (not according to you, or someone else, but according to the fish? )etc., etc. ?