OK, let me be more specific. I too would never withhold information. But that information needs to be correct and unambiguous. Terry is reporting sg as many hobbyists do, in a way that is ambiguous at best and simply wrong at worst.
To say
" This translates to a specific gravity of about 1.009 at 78 to 80F. "
is incorrect, or at least ambiguous enough that many reefers will use the wrong interpretation.
There are two reasons for this ambiguity. The main one of those is that different hydrometers are calibrated for different temperatures. Many reefers (myself included) have hydrometers calibrated to be used at 77 deg F, but that's clearly not what Terry is using. If I used that hydrometer to follow his advice, I'd end up using 11.7 ppt salt water, and not 16 ppt. People in this hobby have conveniently ignored this issue for long enough that it is entrenched in the hobby literature to the detriment of those trying to understand what people really are talking about.
FWIW, any mention of sg determined with a hydrometer really needs to report ALL of the following:
1. The standard temperature being used. That is, the temperature of pure water that the sample is being compared to.
2. The reference temperature. That is, the temperature that the hydrometer is intended to be used at.
3. The sample temperature when the measurement is made.
That's why all quality lab hydrometers have both the standard temperature and the reference temperature on them. It is usually reported something like "Temperature Standard 60 deg F/60 deg F.
FWIW, Stephen Spotte has a nice discussion of such issues in "Captive Seawater Fishes".
So how should Terry report sg in such a context? Here's my suggestion:
"This translates to a hydrometer reading of about 1.009 at 78 to 80F using a 60 deg F/60 deg F hydrometer."