This thought came to me today as I was exchanging posts with "save_the_expos" and "naesco." No offense to "save_the_expos," but why would anyone take advice at face value from this person? Based upon what? I, for one, find it difficult to engage in exchanges or to take advice from anyone hiding behind a wacky screen name. The old Fishnet forum on CompuServe had a rule requiring the use of real names when posting or replying to messages. I think it was a good rule and should be considered here. The use of real names adds credence to posts, promotes more civil exchanges, and will serve to strengthen and differentiate this forum. It also exposes members that may have hidden agendas, such as manufacturers and retailers, or it can serve to distinguish them.
Just a thought.
Greg Schiemer
Just a thought.
Greg Schiemer