• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oceans becoming more acidic


By Richard Black
BBC News - September 24, 2003


The world's oceans are slowly getting more acidic, say scientists.

The researchers from California say the change is taking place in response to higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.



_39375168_ocean_bbc_203.jpg

The oceans play a key role in the Earth's climate system

The lowering of the waters' pH value is not great at the moment but could pose a serious threat to current marine life if it continues, they warn.

Ken Caldeira and Michael Wickett, from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, report their concerns in the journal Nature.

Future prospects

Increasing use of fossil fuels means more carbon dioxide is going into the air, and most of it will eventually be absorbed by seawater. Once in the water, it reacts to form carbonic acid.

Scientists believe that the oceans have already become slightly more acidic over the last century.

But these researchers have tried to predict what will happen in the future by combining what we know about the history of the oceans with computer models of climate change.

"This level of acidity will get much more extreme in the future if we continue releasing CO2 into the atmosphere," said Dr Caldeira.

"And we predicted amounts of future acidity that exceed anything we saw over the last several hundred million years, apart from perhaps after rare catastrophic events such as asteroid impacts."

If carbon dioxide release continues unabated, ocean pH could be reduced by as much as 0.77 units, the authors warn.

Good and bad

It is not absolutely clear what that means for marine life, however.

Most organisms live near the surface, where the greatest pH change would be expected to occur, but deep-ocean lifeforms may be more sensitive to pH changes.

Coral reefs and other organisms whose skeletons or shells contain calcium carbonate may be particularly affected, the team speculate. They could find it much more difficult to build these structures in water with a lower pH.

In recent years some people have suggested deliberately storing carbon dioxide from power stations in the deep ocean as a way of curbing global warming.

But Dr Caldeira said that such a strategy should now be re-considered.

"Previously, most experts had looked at ocean absorption of carbon dioxide as a good thing - because in releasing CO2 into the atmosphere we warm the planet; and when CO2 is absorbed by the ocean, it reduces the amount of greenhouse warming.

"Now, we're understanding that ocean uptake of CO2 may at best be a mixed blessing."
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well part of the CO2 storing idea is that it would be rapidly consumed by phytoplankton - it would turn the water green - big phytoplankton blooms would occur but they would then convert the CO2 like trees - but this one hell of a roll of the dice I agree.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I guess the silver lining would be that the marine organisms that did manage to survive and evolve, would probably be well suited for aquarium life. 8O
 

teevee

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While any species being wiped from the face of the planet is a great loss, I think sometimes we forget that we as humans are also animals, and that this is about survival of the fittest... not that we should run around killing everything. But in order for one species to succeed, often another must suffer. It is up to us whether we give in to this animalian logic, or continue to treat the earth as if it is a pet to be kept in a glass bowl. We are not outside looking in.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In strict animalian terms (minus humans), one species does often suffer at the expense of another, but this is usually due to direct competitive means of survival or preditor vs. prey. Ecosystems suffering so folks can drive SUVs and have 200 amps of electricity piping into their house is not exactly what I would consider necessary for survival - or even proliferation - or even a good quality of life. There are precious few natural examples of wanton destruction in the animal kingdom as a whole...then came humans.

There are some who feel that our superior abilities of reasoning and deduction should be used to increase/maintain our standard of living while minimizing impact on the planet as a whole - not on how to best outcompete the planet's ecosystems. I think we're pretty far ahead of the apes in regard to survival of the fittest...you shouldn't have any worries.

Yes, we are animals. Even though we are most adaptable, not infinitely so.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You forget, that we "humans" possibly the only beings on this planet concsious of our own exisitence, have the power to prevent/change the outcome of a species or two from dying off...Survival of the fittest is almost a thing of the past...We run this planet...we are the keepers we need to ensure others species live....
 

shalegac

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Survivial of the fittest is not what most people think it is. In the strictest terms, survival of the fittest means to be reproductivly succesfull. This means your off spring having offspring of their own.
As far as one speicies thriving at the expense of another... this is usually due to introduction of a forign species. Most species evolve to be compatable with one another keeping populations in check, given the area they live.
Now a phillisophical debate would be whether humans interference is natural or not. That is obviously open to debate. I only know the technical side of it.

Shaun Legacy
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Scientists believe that the oceans have already become slightly more acidic over the last century.


hmmm....
scientists believe?
no test result?
numerical value?

sounds like a populist bogus article/writer to me :P

fwiw-i think it's possible they have, mebbe

or they haven't :wink:

any link to a real study, jb? w/real numbers/data?

or is this another 'junk science' sensationalist post ?:P
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
logo_nature.gif


npg_logo.gif



Oceanography: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH

KEN CALDEIRA* AND MICHAEL E. WICKETT†

* Energy and Environment Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA
† Center for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550, USA


Most carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere as a result of the burning of fossil fuels will eventually be absorbed by the ocean, with potentially adverse consequences for marine biota. Here we quantify the changes in ocean pH that may result from this continued release of CO2 and compare these with pH changes estimated from geological and historical records. We find that oceanic absorption of CO2 from fossil fuels may result in larger pH changes over the next several centuries than any inferred from the geological record of the past 300 million years, with the possible exception of those resulting from rare, extreme events such as bolide impacts or catastrophic methane hydrate degassing.


http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v425/n6956/abs/425365a_fs.html
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top