• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
logo.gif



French author: 'Finding Nemo' plagiarism

'I want my fish to live'

December 31, 2003

PARIS, France (Hollywood Reporter) -- A French children's author has sued Walt Disney Pictures and Pixar Animation Studios, claiming the cartoon fish they catapulted to fame in the worldwide blockbuster "Finding Nemo" was plagiarized from his 1995 creation Pierrot Le Poisson Clown.

Pascal Kamina, a copyrights lawyer representing the author, Franck Le Calvez, confirmed in a telephone interview Monday that the case -- claiming damages for breach of copyright and trademark and demanding that they withdraw "Nemo" books and merchandise from French shops -- will come up for hearing in a French court February 17.

Disney denied the claims.

"We consider the case filed in France to be totally without merit because 'Finding Nemo,' which is owned by Pixar and Disney, was independently developed and does not infringe anyone's copyrights or trademarks," according to a statement that Disney released Monday.

Le Calvez, a 33-year-old aquarium buff, said in an interview Monday that he registered Pierrot as a trademark with France's industrial protection and copyrights body in 1995. An aspiring filmmaker, Le Calvez said he then did the rounds of French production companies and animation studios, hoping they would fall for the lovable tropical fish with white stripes and large orange bulging eyes. But he was turned down, and the little fish languished in a folder until 2000, when Le Calvez decided to make Pierrot the hero of an illustrated children's book.

Registering the screenplay with the French Society of Authors in June 2002, Le Calvez paid nearly $71,000 to publish 2,000 copies of the book in November 2002. Illustrated by Robin Delpuech and Thierry Jagodzinski, "Pierrot Le Poisson Clown" was published by France's Editions Flaven Scene, and the entire print run was sold in a month.

Agreeing that the uncanny resemblance between Pierrot and Nemo could be coincidental (clown fish, Amphiprion ocellaris, do look alike in nature), Le Calvez said he realized something was fishy only after French bookstore chain FNAC removed copies of his book from their shelves, claiming that it was too similar to Disney's version.

"What's really upsetting is that quite a few bookstores won't sell my book because they think that I have plagiarized 'Nemo,'" the author said in an interview Monday. "The two fish look very similar, but it doesn't end there."

Like Nemo, Pierrot lives in a pink sea anemone and starts life half-orphaned because one parent was swallowed up by Liona, the scorpion fish. "The beginning of the story is the same, even if the scenarios then become different," Le Calvez said.

Kamina, who admitted that the film was finished by the time Le Calvez's first book came out (a second has been written since), said he is worried that his client's success will be swallowed up by the American fish. He said the "Nemo" idea probably found its way to the United States through one of the French studios that Le Calvez approached in 1995.

"That would be the only explanation," he said. "It's not just the resemblance of the clown fish, smiling with a raised fin. We have also found the same supporting characters in the film -- such as a surgeon fish and cleaner shrimp -- and gentle fish folk who help the little troubled hero. The similarities are sufficiently troubling for us to ask for an explanation from Disney."


story.finding.nemo.jpg

Pascal Kamina claims Disney and Pixar's Nemo was plagiarized.


The lawyer said his client is still waiting for an answer from Disney and that if they don't hear from the company, Le Calvez will press ahead with his lawsuit in France.

"I want my fish to live," Le Calvez said.


http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/30/nemo.reut/
 

Attachments

  • pierrot.jpg
    pierrot.jpg
    143.9 KB · Views: 2,624

taikonaut

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Disney also plagiarized from thousands of LFS aross the globle, some use the "Nemo" logo for generations. :roll:
 

taikonaut

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
>..Ok, I'm confused....

Obviously, Disney scourers obtained a copy of the manuscript before it was published, and started the film based on the info. on the manuscript.
 

fishfanatic2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Clownfish have to look the way they do.

Was disney suppoosed to give it 12" incisors and make it purple?

THen they also plagiarized the ocean since they copied the clownfish living in an anmeone. SUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:
 

jbpig

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
taikonaut":3r9ohclg said:
>.Obviously, Disney scourers obtained a copy of the manuscript before it was published, and started the film based on the info. on the manuscript.

I just cant believe that it took longer to publish a book tham Disney to do all the animations.....
 

taikonaut

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
With hundreds of programmers working for Pixar, and several large computers, it is not surprising that it can crunch out animations faster than printing press can print ;)

Those sharks in the movie also looks very familiar... I must have seem them in Universal Studios' Jaws display a few years ago...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If he's an aquarium buff, he could have at least put the clown in the correct anemone...looks like a Condylactis to me.
 

GSchiemer

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There have been numerous children's "clownfish" books written before Disney's "Nemo" came to the big screen. I remember reading one to my children years ago. A quick look on Barnes and Noble revealed a few titles published years before "Nemo."

The description to the "The Curious Clownfish," published in 1998, bears a resemblance to "Nemo" as well: Timid clownfish live within the Anemone and never venture beyond its protective tenacles--until Curious Clownfish decides to explore the world around her.... It appears Mr. French may be the one guilty of plagiarizing!

There's also "Clownfish Reef" published in 2001.

Greg
 

Attachments

  • curious clownfish.gif
    curious clownfish.gif
    5 KB · Views: 2,496
  • clownfish reef.gif
    clownfish reef.gif
    2 KB · Views: 2,496

c0yote

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hopefully he gets his free publicity, the bookstores restock his book and this lawsuit goes away. If he does win, start looking for animals that Disney has yet to do a movie about and let the trademarking bonanza begin! :)
 

fishfanatic2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
:lol: :lol:
We can get Tarzan in there, too!

This is so retarded. I think this is a publicity stunt for this guys new book.

"I want my fish to live," Le Calvez said

As long as your fish doesn't play dead and get flushed down the toilet, then it won't die, pal. Or did you make that up too, so we can sue Disney on TWO counts!

Like Nemo, Pierrot lives in a pink sea anemone and starts life half-orphaned because one parent was swallowed up by Liona, the scorpion fish.

I think the mom was eaten by a barracuda in Nemo. That's a difference!

Sigh
 

teevee

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A difficult case, certainly. But if he is not able to have stores stock his book because the shops believe he plagiarized Disney, it would be grounds for a suit, I think.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Screw the French. I hope that pathetic loser gets nothing. I'm no fan of Disney, but that lawsuit is crap. Disney uses a movie to bash fish keeping, yet they let other companies sell Nemo fish tanks and other junk that a kid will be bored of in a week. Therefore killing even more ocean caught clownfish. It's an enigma, screw them both!
 

Minh Nguyen

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
teevee":1jq98hla said:
A difficult case, certainly. But if he is not able to have stores stock his book because the shops believe he plagiarized Disney, it would be grounds for a suit, I think.
What does Disney have anything to do with this? So go sue the shops.
Minh
 

taikonaut

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
>... What does Disney have anything to do with this? So go sue the shops.

The only difference is that the store owner has slightly smaller asset than the Disney.
 

hillbilly

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Minh Nguyen":1f8xbuuq said:
teevee":1f8xbuuq said:
A difficult case, certainly. But if he is not able to have stores stock his book because the shops believe he plagiarized Disney, it would be grounds for a suit, I think.
What does Disney have anything to do with this? So go sue the shops.
Minh[/quote
You can't sue the shops man, they don't have any money. Disney has the money!!!
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top