• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

Unarce

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Double-end bulbs run cooler than single-end, creating less of a heat issue. They are also more efficient, offering higher output per watt (a 250W DE is the near equivalent to a 400W SE).

On the otherhand, double-end bulbs lack the glass envelope that moguls have. This means that the bulbs high output emits harmful UV-A and UV-B rays, which requires the use of a protective glass between the bulb and tank. The glass requirement and double sockets fixture makes DIYing a bit a bit more difficult.
 

ricky1414

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have come across the statement that DE's are more efficient than SE bulbs. Is this due to the construction ofthe bulb itself, or is it due to the superior reflecting capabilities of DE pendants?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
reefnutz":27etogfr said:
The glass requirement and double sockets fixture makes DIYing a bit a bit more difficult.
Agreed but arguable.. - Their smaller size could be said to make them more conducive to DIY'ing.
 

wstellwagen

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The double ended bulbs have a built in reflector tailored to the actual bulb. This makes them superior to a mogul bulb with no reflector or a
less than ideal reflector.

Walt
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GratefulDiver":3dvsivng said:
reefnutz":3dvsivng said:
The glass requirement and double sockets fixture makes DIYing a bit a bit more difficult.
Agreed but arguable.. - Their smaller size could be said to make them more conducive to DIY'ing.

I can't get over your avatar, I'm cracking up over here!
:lol:

I just buy completed fixtures, and I like the DE's. More output per $$$ spent on power. More bang for the buck. However, if I was setting up an SPS only tank right now, I'd use the 400w SE radiums. All the best SPS only tanks I've seen use those. My tank now is Euphulia, E. quads and mushrooms now though, so my 250w DE 20K's work out just right.

Jim
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks on the avatar.. - Someone posted the pic in the Sump I just adapted (adopted?) it.. :P

Are there many people using 400w DE's yet? - I'd have thought those would start edging out over the SE's - but then again, what do I know..?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
wstellwagen":ff71vkpa said:
The double ended bulbs have a built in reflector tailored to the actual bulb. This makes them superior to a mogul bulb with no reflector or a less than ideal reflector.

Walt

I don't believe that is the case. Often the DE bulbs come in a pendant with a reflector, but the bulb itself doesn't have one. But you may be talking about something I have never heard of.

There is a DE bulb built into a mogul spot light style bulb, but it is new and only comes in 70 and 150 watts.

I run 4 250 DE and 1 150 DE in pendants and I like them better than moguls because it is real hard to break the bulb with splash.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm sure he's referring to the new Iwaski's that Icecap is distrubiting in states.
 

kim

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That a 250 W DE is equivalent to a 400 W SE is ludicrous. Why would anyone buy the SE ? Why do the makers state approximately the same lumens/watt (you could sue.....) ?

This is an urban myth amongst reefers, speak to a lighting professional. You think they throw away millions of dollars pa because SE lamps are "cool" ?

Having said that, a smaller lamp facilitates making a reflector which can concentrate light. In particular, most SE reflectors are made for industrial/"botanical" applications, where spreading light thinly over a wide area is preferred to concentrating it.

That results in low par, unless you take measures to "trap" the light.

But don't blame the lamp. It is the same physics.

kim
 

Unarce

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Okay, Kim. I didn't say they were equal, but near equivalent. The one 250W double-end (HQI 10000K) bulb below is quite comparable to the list of 400 watters. So, it's not as incongruous as you might think. :wink:
 

Attachments

  • 250w.jpg.gif
    250w.jpg.gif
    8.1 KB · Views: 2,472
  • 400w.jpg
    400w.jpg
    21.5 KB · Views: 2,470
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
reefnutz":2psz4h2r said:
Double-end bulbs run cooler than single-end, creating less of a heat issue.

I've heard the opposite. I have put my hand below a 150w DE and a 175w SE and felt that the DE ran hotter.
 

wstellwagen

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No I wasn"t referring to the new Iwasaki mentioned by Greg Schemier in this months AA. But to a series of earlier articles by Joshi and Harker.

Walt
 

ChaoticReefer

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The difference between 250w DE and 400w SE is that the DE has a less lighting area for the high par then the 400w. So all of your high light coral have to be all bunch up in the center if you are running DE.

DE bulb is not cooler then SE to touch. The SE spreads the heat out over a larger area, whereas, DE saturates heat onto a smaller area making the bulb definitely hotter. But it might be cooler system wise like MH are cooler then fluorescence bulbs even though fluorescence bulbs are cooler to touch.
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top