A
Anonymous
Guest
JT":39drmiom said:you should see what happens with corals arriving in LAX
PM if you'd like...I'm intrigued. What is it?
Peace,
Chip
JT":39drmiom said:you should see what happens with corals arriving in LAX
There are many ways in which CITES numbers get bypassed by exporters AND importers.marillion":2k6t2iz8 said:PM if you'd like...I'm intrigued. What is it?JT":2k6t2iz8 said:you should see what happens with corals arriving in LAX
In some states it's illegal to even possess certain species. Leopard Sharks in Florida is one such species. A FL customer of a certain wholesaler I used to work at, actually I know of three FL customers but I worked closely with this one, purchased leopard sharks from this wholesaler and was quite surprised when Fish & Wildlife confiscated the sharks and issued large fines for having them.Vili_Shark":sh4ke76a said:Did SDC break the law? No they did not.
Nope, I have nothing personal against Eric nor SDC. Eric is a great guy and SDC was a great company to work for and has one of the better holding facilities in LA. I've said this before and I'll continue to stand by this. However, I do have issues with certain buying and business practices that I witnessed and I'm going to continue voicing my distain about this because they are unethical and I'm sorry if I have a higher moral standard.Vili_Shark":2ipvhjp4 said:Dont you have a motive writing all this about Eric?
January of 2004, with Eric's permission, Craig Lightner and a photographer entered SDC on a Sunday evening around 9pm and proceeded to take several hundred pictures to be used in a new online retail site. Eric knew exactly why Craig was having the pictures taken. I know this as fact because I was the photographer. I have two CD's full of pictures to back up this claim. Anyone that has been inside SDC will recognize the interior. There is no one present, and the main lights are off. It is very obvious that the picture are being taken after hours.Mitch,
We have allowed photos to be taken by both etailers and retailers. All we ask is that we are also allowed to use the photos and we don't charge people for taking pictures. We have never done this "after hours" except in one case when it was an x-employee setting up a combo retailer/etailer.
While I worked with Craig on this start up operation called West Coast Tropical Marine, we routinely used SDC to help fill the daily orders, and usually came no where near to order minimums. There were days when we wouldn't purchase more than a fish or two. At times I was paying Honduras Connection invoices at SDC with WCTM company checks. I can back this up with canceled checks, SDC invoices that cooraborate the checks, as well as the fact the I always noted in the memo that they were for Honduras Connection and the SDC invoice number.We don't discriminate between a mail order company or a retailer as they are both selling to the same customer level, but we do have a more restrictive policy on minimum orders for etailers and we are more strict on our minimum order policys.
No, not Daniel. Notice my sig, "Marc". Did you think I was the "Daniel" that worked umpteen years for Craig...the Daniel who's wife worked for you?Daniel.....? I think you are Daniel?
Well, that certainly explains why the heavy set female blond employee approached us that night and said "are one of you Craig?" To which Craig replied "I am", to which your employee replied "here, I was told to give you this check when you came by tonight to take some pictures".Simply that I have no idea why you would think I would let a guy like Craig Lightner nor anyone else for that matter come into SDC after hours like you suggest. NOBODY except for management is allowed to be in the warehouse.....
I guess I would not be surprised if Craig did swindle his way in there and try to sweet talk one of the managers on a late Sunday night.....but that has nothing to do with me giving him permission to do so.
It's just absurd your statements.....and I am not really sure why you would think that I would allow something like that.
Why would you answer a portion of my post that you can twist into a positive light, but ignore my most damaging statement. You've done this several times. You just did it again in your most recent post by ignoring a major portion of my post.If I have not answered your questions, then please feel free to ask them again.....either here or pm. I am always willing to be open and honest about these matters.
Bravo. My senitments exactly and the same reasons I've continued posting when I could have chosen not to and let sleeping dogs be. I couldn't have said any of this better myself.danieldm":v3xz6exd said:Eric. I am not out on a vendetta against you or SDC. If you hadn't started posting "spin control" untruths I would never have posted myself. You and I both know that everything that I am saying is the truth, and I could easily back my allegations up with evidence. If you would simply stop posting your spin control attempts, I'll let you off the hook easily. But if you choose to continue with this charade you will force me to start posting factual evidence that you simply cannot refute. This does neither of us any good, and certainly not you.
In my opinion, you are part of the disease in this industry, and certainly not part of the cure. Please take my offer, I have far better things to do that put together a profile on you.