• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lafayette May Start Philippine Copper Exports After Mine Spills

By Luzi Ann R. Javier

Sept. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Lafayette Mining Ltd., the first overseas company to open a Philippine mine under relaxed investment rules, may begin copper concentrate exports in November as it ramps up production after two accidents.

The Rapu Rapu mine was ordered by the government to suspend operations last November after two cyanide spills. It has since restarted work under government supervision, pending clearance from the authorities its practices are safe.

``We're already in full commercial production,'' Bayani Agabin, a spokesman for the Melbourne-based company's Philippine unit, said Sept. 5. ``The only difference is that we're being monitored.''

The fate of the $60 million mine is a test case for the government of President Gloria Arroyo, which wants to boost an industry that could provide jobs and investment as metals prices surge. Environmentalists demanded Rapu Rapu's closure, as did religious groups and a state panel that probed the leakages.

``This is a test of government's resolve to support the local mining industry,'' Peter Wallace, director of the Australian-New Zealand Chamber of Commerce (Philippines) Inc., said on Sept. 5.

The Southeast Asian nation's mineral wealth may be worth up to $1 trillion, the government has said. Still, mining accounted for only 1 percent of the $98 billion economy last year.

Copper Record

Agabin didn't say what volume of copper the company expects to export in November. Concentrate usually contains about a third of the metal that's used to make pipes and wires. Copper futures in London rose to a record $8,800 a ton in May.

Lafayette's shares, which have halved over the past year, dropped 1.2 percent today to trade at 8.2 Australian cents.

``This mine should never be allowed to reopen,'' Father Ino Bugaoisan of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines said Sept. 4, arguing it's damaged the environment. ``We will go to the Supreme Court to stop it,'' Father Bugaoisan added. The conference represents the country's Catholic's hierarchy, an influential body in the largely Catholic nation.

Lafayette's Agabin said: ``We've done all that's required by the government to ensure that last year's spills will not be repeated.''

Rapu Rapu, located 350 kilometers (218 miles) southwest of Manila, the capital, in Albay province can produce 10,000 tons of copper concentrate and 14,000 tons of zinc a year, according to the company. It also produces gold and silver.

Overseas Investor

The venture was the first overseas-owned mine to operate in the country after the Supreme Court in 2004 upheld a law allowing overseas investors to own large-scale mines. Lafayette developed the mine from 1999, opened it in July 2005, and suspended production four months later after the leakages.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources ordered from July 10 a three-stage test run to see whether the mine complies with safety rules set to avoid a repeat of the spills.

The government will allow the mine to fully reopen only after passing the tests. In mining, cyanide solution is poured over low-grade ore to extract the targeted metal. After the spills, the chemical leaked into local watercourses and the sea.

Lafayette paid a fine of 10.4 million pesos ($206,718) for the two spills, the company said in July. The closure was costing $50,000 a day in lost production, it said Nov. 29.

`Mine Wasn't Running'

Still, Greenpeace International, an environmental group, said Lafayette's mine work had been killing fish during the period of testing. The company rejected that charge.

``They haven't even been allowed to officially reopen the mine and they're already causing another fish kill,'' said Beau Baconguis, a campaigner at Greenpeace International in Manila.

Lafayette said the fish died in July, between the test's first and second stages. ``There was no way that could have been caused by us because the mine wasn't even running,'' said Joey Cubias, another spokesman for Lafayette's Philippine unit. The fish were killed by pesticides, not cyanide, Cubias added.

To contact the reporter on this story: Luzi Ann Javier in Manila at [email protected]

Last Updated: September 6, 2006 20:49 EDT
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Priest threatens to take Aussie mine to court


A Filipino priest has threatened to take a Melbourne-based mining company "to the Supreme Court to stop it" from fully reopening its Philippine mine after it was shut because of two cyanide spills.

According to a Bloomberg report, Fr Ino Bugauisan of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines said that the company has damaged the environment.

"This mine should never be allowed to reopen," he said this week. "We will go to the Supreme Court to stop it."

Bloomberg reports that the Conference represents the country's Catholic's hierarchy, an influential body in the largely Catholic nation.

The mine based in Rapu Rapu was ordered by the government to suspend operations last November after the spills, which affected local creeks.

Lafayette paid a fine of 10.4 million pesos (A$270,000) for the two spills, the company said in July. The closure was costing $50,000 a day in lost production, the company said last year.

The venture has since restarted work under government supervision, pending full clearance from the authorities that practices are safe.

The project, the first overseas-funded mine to open under relaxed investment rules, is a test case for President Gloria Arroyo, who wants to attract overseas investment to boost growth. The Southeast Asian nation's mineral wealth may be worth up to $1 trillion, the government has said.

A Lafayette spokesperson said: "We've done all that's required by the government to ensure that last year's spills will not be repeated."

Still, environmentalist and church groups said Lafayette's mine work had been killing fish during the period of testing. The company rejected that charge.

"They haven't even been allowed to officially reopen the mine and they're already causing another fish kill," said Beau Baconguis, a campaigner at Greenpeace International in Manila.

Lafayette said the fish died in July, between the test's first and second stages. "There was no way that could have been caused by us because the mine wasn't even running," said Joey Cubias, another spokesman for Lafayette's Philippine unit. The fish were killed by pesticides, not cyanide, Cubias added.

Meanwhile, the Sydney Morning Herald reports that three foreign firms are interested in investing in the gold and copper mine if Manila allows it to reopen, the company's lawyer said.

Bayani Agabin said prospective investors included firms from Singapore, Australia and Canada but declined to identify them. Agabin said officials from the three firms had visited the Rapu Rapu island.


SOURCE
(Bloomberg 7/9/06)
Foreign firms keen on Lafayette mine (The Age 7/9/06)

LINKS (not necessarily endorsed by Church Resources)
Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines
Lafayette Mining
Saving an Island (Bulatlat, 20-26 November 2005)

ARCHIVE
Oxfam weighs in on debate over Australian mine in Philippines (CathNews, 10/8/06)
Fish kill confirmed near Australian mine in Philippines, priest denies sabotage (CathNews, 16/8/06)
Lafayette rejects community claims over spill (CathNews 31/7/06)
Filipino Bishop disappointed over Lafayette mine decision (CathNews 14/6/06)

8 Sep 2006
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't see how cyanide extraction mining can ever be safe from a geological standpoint over there.
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just to clarify. They are not mining cyanide. They are mining copper with some associated gold and silver. The cyanide is used to extract the minerals from the copper ore. Similar mining operations occur in the USA and Canada. The effluents can be treated to neutralize the cyanide. So, most mines using cyanide are safe for the environment provided their effluents are treated.

Peter
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm a degreed geologist specializing in environmental remediation, Peter.

I'm saying that from a practical standpoint the leachate will not be confined. Leachates often aren't well confined in first world countries with aggressive government agencies (exempli gratia: US and EPA) to keep industry in line. Things are always worse in second and third world countries. If a few government officials are bribed and a couple of corners are cut - disaster. If technology isn't well maintained and operations aren't closely monitored - disaster. If an area gets played out, and the operating company's officials disappear - who's going to clean the place up? It'll sit idle until it's a disaster.

Mark my words, there will be another spill, or a leak. One year there will be an unexpectedly large rainy season and a dam will fail or a pond will overflow its berm. Perhaps a pond’s liner system will fail and the leachate will seep into the porous and/or fractured underlying geology. If the ponds or vats are not fully netted there will be animal deaths. Bat, reptile and amphibian populations are usually some of the first to be impacted.

It is very difficult to confine these processes in an arid environment with tight underlying pedologic and geologic lithologies. It is damn near impossible confine these processes in a humid environment with government watchdogs that are not savvy.

Heck, I’ll contend that it is easier to safely operate a nuclear power plant than to keep these operations environmentally safe.

I wouldn't allow a company to operate one of those operations without $1 billion (US) in escrow. Maybe $5-10 billion in escrow would be wiser.

The priest is the only person acting on the best interests of the people and the environment.

-Lee
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
SciGuy, I completely agree that the history of mining in the Philippines is not pretty, for the reasons you cited. I was hired by a Canadian church group to do a environmental review of the existing Marcopper open-pit copper mining operation (Taipan mine pit) and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed new copper mine (San Antonio) on Marinduque Island in 1990. The Marcopper mine was half owned by the Philippine government under Ferdinand Marcos. The President overrode recommendations by the DENR Bureau of Mines and the DENR Environmental Management Bureau. I suspect that cyanide was used with the Marcopper mine, but was never able to confirm it.

About 30,000 tonnes of mine waste tailings from the Marcopper mine were dumped daily from a pipe into Calacan Bay for about 20 years causing degredation of coral reefs (from sedimentation mostly) over a 200 square mile area. Deep water disposal was proposed but never implemented. Finally the head of DENR authorized the dumping of unrefined mine tailings into the old Taipan pit, when they wished to open a new mine (San Antonio) at a site nearby (under the on-land mine tailings previously deposited).

The Taipan pit filled up with toxic wastes. About 1997, a tunnel through the mountain leaked mine wastes into the Boac River flooding the river valley with 20 feet of mine tailings. This has caused groundwater pollution (acidification of groundwater) and heavy metal contamination for the whole island. So, while the problem is not cyanide it is an example of how lax regulation has created an environmental disaster that has destroyed the marine environment and destroyed much of Marinduque Island.

The Canadian Company-Placer Dome that owned about half of Marcopper washed its hands of the problem and left the Philippines, leaving its mess behind. President Estrada had his hands in the ownership of the San Antonio mine and is now in jail for curruption. I assume that greedy politicians will eventually open the San Antonio mine, now that the price of copper has gone up.

The environmental cleanup of the mine wastes in Calacan Bay and the Boac River basin has not been done. With wise planning they could have had their cake and still protected the marine environment. But, the corruption and incompetence in the Philippines knows no bounds.

So, you are right that environmental regulation in 3rd world countries does not work. Opening the door to foreign companies with no Filipino ownership requirement will probably make things worse.

Peter
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So they start the process all over again.

Pathetic, isn't it?

You may call me Lee, Peter.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
SciGuy2":34njmkxn said:
So they start the process all over again.

Pathetic, isn't it?

You may call me Lee, Peter.

Bah, holed up in the lab again :lol: Gonna go to MACNA?

Peter, Lee is an old hand around here, and a very sharp one at that :D
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Gresham, I know Lee. I am happy to address him and everyone else by their real names, if they wish.

Peter
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GreshamH":2irz9yxz said:
SciGuy2":2irz9yxz said:
So they start the process all over again.

Pathetic, isn't it?

You may call me Lee, Peter.

Bah, holed up in the lab again :lol: Gonna go to MACNA?

I can't make it this year, too many prior commitments. Tis a shame, it looks like it will be a great one this year. That MARSH/Borneman study looks like it will be a hum dinger.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
PeterIMA":1yxl4xnl said:
Gresham, I know Lee. I am happy to address him and everyone else by their real names, if they wish.

Peter

Thank you, Peter. I think that we might have met in person a few years ago, but neither one of us knew the other at the time. Did you attend the MACNA conference in Ft. Worth a few years back?
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lee, The last MACNA that I attended was in Ft. Lauderdale. After the MAC took over, there did not appear to be any reason for attending MACNA.

Peter
 

sdcfish

Junior Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Peter wrote:
After the MAC took over, there did not appear to be any reason for attending MACNA
.

Did MAC take over Macna?

MAC = Marine Aquarium Council
MACNA = Marine Aquarium Conference of North America

Should be a great Macna in Houston! Let's party!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
sdcfish":2zxkmxwc said:
Peter wrote:
After the MAC took over, there did not appear to be any reason for attending MACNA
.

Did MAC take over Macna?

MAC = Marine Aquarium Council
MACNA = Marine Aquarium Conference of North America

Should be a great Macna in Houston! Let's party!

You forgot one.

MASNA = Marine Aquarium Societies of North America

MASNA has executive oversight over the MACNA conference.

MAC and MASNA are two entirely distinct and separate entities. They always have been and they always will be. If anything, MASNA has distanced itself from MAC in recent years.

However, the conferences are pretty much run by the club hosting the MACNA event. As such, the conference might appear to be more (or less) sympathetic of MAC each year depending on the personality of the host club, and the personalities of the host club's officers.

MACNA is a hobbyist run event primarily for hobbyists.

-Lee
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
lee-

you mean the same epa that declared the wtc zone safe from toxins after the towers came down?

the epa run by christine whitman, as proxy for the head evildoers bush cheney, rumsfeld and big oil, who are poisoning this country and setting back clean air/water standards by decades ? -who was a mindless booby while trying to run joisey, and got promoted by the head cheese nincompoop ? (i oughtta know-i lived in joisey while she tried to govern it, lol)

;)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
SciGuy2":2g8zze96 said:
sdcfish":2g8zze96 said:
Peter wrote:
After the MAC took over, there did not appear to be any reason for attending MACNA
.

Did MAC take over Macna?

MAC = Marine Aquarium Council
MACNA = Marine Aquarium Conference of North America

Should be a great Macna in Houston! Let's party!

You forgot one.

MASNA = Marine Aquarium Societies of North America

MASNA has executive oversight over the MACNA conference.

MAC and MASNA are two entirely distinct and separate entities. They always have been and they always will be. If anything, MASNA has distanced itself from MAC in recent years.

However, the conferences are pretty much run by the club hosting the MACNA event. As such, the conference might appear to be more (or less) sympathetic of MAC each year depending on the personality of the host club, and the personalities of the host club's officers.

MACNA is a hobbyist run event primarily for hobbyists.

-Lee

Heh Ft. Lauderdale was the beginning of the Paul Holthus show at MACNA. I hope they are distancing themselves more and more from MAC.
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just for clarification. The Ft. Lauderdale meeting is where Paul Holthus was a main speaker. He announced that the MAC had blocked the US Coral Reef Task Force from shutting down the aquarium trade. I also learned that Bruce Bunting of WWF, Marshall Myers of PIJAC, and Paul Holthus representing MAC had previously gone to Washington (in May 2001 if my memory is correct) and met with Congressmen and members of the US Coral Reef Task Force. Someone in the audiance asked Holthus whether lobbying Congressmen was a conflict of interest, considering that the MAC was (and still is) an NGO with 501-C3 status that forbids lobbying? Holthus denied that what they had done was lobbying.

A member of the USCRTF in the audiance was given an opportunity to speak to a much smaller audiance in a separate room. So, I interpret this to indicate that both sides had their say, but that the MASNA board favored the MAC. Needless to say the USCRTF was not amused.

MASNA and MAC have not helped to reform the trade. Hence, I don't expect much sympathy to the aquarium trade or marine hobby from the USCRTF and the next Congress with regard to future legislation to regulate the aquarium trade and deal with the illegal import of cyanide-caught marine aquarium fishes.
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It appears that in he early stages of the game, MASNA like so many others [ most in fact ] mistook the mission stated on paper with the ability to carry it out.

To put it into every day English...they confused the loan application so to speak with the loan qualification.
The loan was granted by people wowed by sophistry and appearances....and the mortgage hasn't been paid since.
In business culture this is a 2 month correction...and then the foreclosure threats start come streaming in.
In NGO culture its a "give em a little more time thing"...you know, another 5 years or so. So gentle...so forgiving.
What incredible tolerance we have for failure in the most critical things that we say we care so much about!
We are so very nice.
Steve
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There is a peanut gallery looking over my shoulder with real estate experience. They suggest an addendum to my last post.

They say that if they ever tried to push thru loans with such bogus qualifying and credibility fudging that they would be out of the job in short order.
The blame for the inability to meet the commitment is not blamed entirely on the one who falls short but the one who processed his application and went to bat for him.
Bad loans count against loan officers and they are ashamed of them.
Wasting time , money and peoples hopes and dreams is not something to become comfortable with and not something to accept as part of the game.
Learning to be a loser and accept failure as commonplace is the exact opposite of what business people try to do.
A socio/economic/business ethic is needed to change the system...not wannabie, semi-scientists "giving it a shot" and having a good time spashing about in the shallows in tropical locales.
There is too much at stake to leave it to the newbies to play with.
Steve
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top