There is a lot of evidence to show that a good, healthy diet of natural foods (e.g.- marine copepod nauplii for seahorse larvae) goes a long way in sustaining the overall health and disease resistance of an organism. Since it is difficult to raise the proper food for seahorse larvae, they often get fed enriched artemia, which is a less complete diet, nutritionally (or at least is less digestible or usable for the seahorse larvae). In this case, a seahorse raised in a net-pen in the ocean (in a proper location - near the sea floor around algal beds), would be most likely healthier in terms of disease resistance. Another benefit is that an increase in growth and survival is also seen with the offering of natural copepod nauplii.
I hope this helps answer your question SHW. But remember, your question is inherently filled with many variabilities due to its broadened scope. Comparing net-penned to enriched artemia raised seahorses is apples to oranges, because there is many different variables for each condition. The best method would be to work on production of natural live feeds and then compare the growth of seahorses fed natural live feeds in aquaria to those in a net-pen, as there is an obvious shortcoming to enriched artemia.
I hope this helps answer your question SHW. But remember, your question is inherently filled with many variabilities due to its broadened scope. Comparing net-penned to enriched artemia raised seahorses is apples to oranges, because there is many different variables for each condition. The best method would be to work on production of natural live feeds and then compare the growth of seahorses fed natural live feeds in aquaria to those in a net-pen, as there is an obvious shortcoming to enriched artemia.