Hmmm...
I don't honestly understand the concern over a few VERY high-end fish going directly from collector to consumer in this industry. (And for some perspective on who this is coming from, I work managing the largest MO retailer in Oregon outside of Portland). To be honest, we rarely move fish in the $100-200 range - let alone fish in the $2000 range. I would have an issue if the same collector started selling bread and butter direct to consumer (as I think everyone would) but to be honest I would almost prefer the direct-to-consumer model for such high-end items. (If I have a customer that wants let's say, a purple Rhinopias sp. and I find one via a wholesaler I have to assume a huge risk for the customer in even getting the animal to my store. Quite often these animals aren't "guaranteed" by the wholesaler and if something happens in shipping it's my pocketbook it affects.).
I also find it quite ironic that Kevin is so up in arms that the cistomers he provides "service" to are being "denied" these fish. Really? Well now you know how we b&m stores feel when etailers transship to cut costs and then sell to the customers that we provide "service" to. It's okay to cut out one middleman to save money but heaven forbid we do more than that for one or two customers on, again, some fish that the vast majority of retailers don't want and aren't going to buy anyway?
This is all much ado about nothing in my book - but it is funny to see the etailer response. How do the shoes feel now that they're on the other foot?
Cheers,
Austin
I don't honestly understand the concern over a few VERY high-end fish going directly from collector to consumer in this industry. (And for some perspective on who this is coming from, I work managing the largest MO retailer in Oregon outside of Portland). To be honest, we rarely move fish in the $100-200 range - let alone fish in the $2000 range. I would have an issue if the same collector started selling bread and butter direct to consumer (as I think everyone would) but to be honest I would almost prefer the direct-to-consumer model for such high-end items. (If I have a customer that wants let's say, a purple Rhinopias sp. and I find one via a wholesaler I have to assume a huge risk for the customer in even getting the animal to my store. Quite often these animals aren't "guaranteed" by the wholesaler and if something happens in shipping it's my pocketbook it affects.).
I also find it quite ironic that Kevin is so up in arms that the cistomers he provides "service" to are being "denied" these fish. Really? Well now you know how we b&m stores feel when etailers transship to cut costs and then sell to the customers that we provide "service" to. It's okay to cut out one middleman to save money but heaven forbid we do more than that for one or two customers on, again, some fish that the vast majority of retailers don't want and aren't going to buy anyway?
This is all much ado about nothing in my book - but it is funny to see the etailer response. How do the shoes feel now that they're on the other foot?
Cheers,
Austin