With a refractometer calibrated to RO water,and a temp of 78,and a reading of 1.022 on refractometer would it really be 1.022? Or do I have to do any math?
_________________
recession news
_________________
recession news
btodd43":1q9fmdnx said:With a refractometer calibrated to RO water,and a temp of 78,and a reading of 1.022 on refractometer would it really be 1.022? Or do I have to do any math?
Guy":2pbqnhon said:Salinity matters, S.G. is irrelevant.
ickypimp":1vy68auf said:Guy":1vy68auf said:Salinity matters, S.G. is irrelevant.
what utter nonsense...
SG is a perfectly acceptable measurment of suitability of aquarium water...
ickypimp":wo36tsi3 said:what utter nonsense...
ChrisRD":22epkpdo said:ickypimp":22epkpdo said:what utter nonsense...
Differences of opinion and open discussion/debate/disagreements are welcome here, but please try to keep the dialogue civil.
Thanks.
Guy":22epkpdo said:The discussion was about refractometers and that is what my comment was in reference to. I'm not sure why you spun off on mixing salt and hydrometers. The S.G. scale on a refractometer won't normally be accurate, the Salinity scale will be. My point was to ignore the S.G. scale and use the Salinity side.
i guess i added 2+2 and came up with 6
btodd43":1bj1cpe9 said:Thanks Chris- Appreciate it, Salinity on refractometer should read 1.025-26 and all will be swell. Yay !
Guy":7hh172ml said:[adding a S.G. scale to a refractometer are equivalently deceptive IMO.
Sula":2t6w6cnm said:Guy":2t6w6cnm said:[adding a S.G. scale to a refractometer are equivalently deceptive IMO.
Still not making sense to me. Traditional refractometers ONLY had an SG scale, I think adding the salinity scale is the deceptive part. It implies that you are getting a direct measurement of Salt content, and that is not true.