• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

arnjer

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sony Mavica FD83...got the camera an extra battery leather case all for $150.00 It was in great condition.

Jerry
 

nanite

Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Everyone...

I have a Kodak EasyShare CX4310 - 3.2 Mega Pixels

Here's a picture that i took of some Nano tanks that i was looking at..
 

Attachments

  • maybe.jpg
    maybe.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 1,213
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Kodak cx6330..alright camera i guess..i like it for what its worth...
 

Attachments

  • 000_0003.jpg
    000_0003.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 1,182

ji

Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I had a coolpix 990, but I have replaced it with
a Nikon D70 with a 105mm Macro Lens. The
coolpix is great if what you are taking a picture of
stands still, while the (more expensive) D70
is fantastic, even on moving objects.


Linked is a image of a brain coral. Most of the
details (on the tenacles for example)
are not visible to the naked eye. The depth of
field is tiny.

http://john.poly.edu/fish/coral.jpg
 

ji

Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It is hard. The effective aparture becomes smaller
as you approach 1:1. You have to keep the
shutter spped high because the coral is moving.
That, and despite the ammount of lighting over the
tank, the tank is really not that bright compared
to outside. Normally, for macro, one would just
pummel the subject with the flash, but the glass
causes problems with this. Has anyone tried a remote
flash mounted on the top of the tank?


tangir1":2zaezobs said:
Nice pic, ji. But can't you use a smaller aparture and increase the DOF? :?
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top