An anemone has many ways to get its food.
Regardless of the path choosen...
It must meet 100% of the animals needs for it to be "healthy",IMO. The zooxanthellae cannot do this for the animal. Does not matter how much light you give it.
Direct feedings can give the animal 100% of its needs.
Unless you determine that you will not keep an anemone in a tank. That you know you can't properly directly feed it in, and export nutrients properly. Then you will have to supply other food route(s)for the animal.
*Just dont fool yourself!*
Just because an anemone has healthy zooxanthellae. Does not mean the animal itself is healthy. That is why they MUST be fed!This would not make anymore sense than my reply previously. (hence, the stupid statement...)
If you choose a small tank then be ready to compensate, and meet the animals needs. I must ask though why you would do this to an anemone, but not a tang(small tank)?
*IMO* With the advice seen above I *might* be able to keep an anemone alive. Healthy though, is a whole 'nother ballgame. Just cause something is alive does not mean it is healthy.
Here is analogy for ya...
Zooxanthellae are like a UPS(backup power supply) for a computer. Sure it can run it if you lose power(how long though?. Does that mean you should do it on purpose? Why not, just do things right and use it for what it was meant?
HTH
side note: I do read Dr. Ron's posts. So alot of my thought process is along the same lines. I do not use the post to reference what I say. If this is what you mean.
Please tell me why with the "current" methodology, we as hobbiest, have such a difficult time keeping these animals in our aquariums. They are very hardy and live very long life's in the wild.
Could it be the "current" methodology is wrong?
[ September 07, 2001: Message edited by: Grandczar ]