Originally posted by dizzy
Must of been a hurricane release.
Hurricane release, what the heck is a hurricane release? It's even funnier since it's mentioned so casually, like it's a common occurence, "Oh, just another hurricane release".
First thing is there hasn't been a hurricane down here that could have done this (if it could be done at all) since Andrew back in the early 90's. Contrary to popular belief, south Florida is not pummeled by devastating hurricanes every year. And then, what are the chances of one of these fish surviving the destruction of the house and it's tank and then making it's way to the open ocean? Almost infinitesimal, I'd imagine.
On the other hand I don't have a very hard time believing that someone released these fish for some reason or other. There's someone on this very forum asking about the viability of releasing Tridacna clams in the gulf.
I'm all for blaming Marc Weiss, though :wink:
:idea: Maybe it was a tornado release. Ya, that's it. We've had a few of those down here recently and, heck, if it worked for Dorothy and Toto then why not a few angelfish, right?
Originally posted by Rover
I've never understood the problem with introduced species. How do you tell if it is "unnaturally" introduced?
What!!! Well, um hows this:
Originally posted by John Brandt
The largest set of intentionally released marine fish was carried out in temperate coastal and inland seas of Russia in the 20th century. Sixteen species became established, with ecologically and economically devastating results, including harm to valuable fisheries, parasite introductions and the endangerment and extinction of native species.
I guess if "ecologically and economically devastating results" are not a "problem" then I can't help you understand this anymore.
Seriously, If you are familiar with the catastrophic results of many past exotic species introductions, I'm not sure how you can't see this as being a potentially huge problem?