• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
logo.gif



Freeing Nemo: Aquarium owners releasing non-native fish could endanger marine ecosystems


University of Washington
April 7, 2004

Flushing your pet tropical fish to set it free is a bad idea. So is releasing it at the beach.

Intentional and unintentional aquarium releases have been a leading cause of freshwater fish invasions, but now researchers from the University of Washington and the Reef Environmental Education Foundation have found 16 non-native species of fish – apparently set free from home aquariums – in ocean waters off the southeast coast of Florida.

This is an unprecedented number of non-native marine fish in a concentrated geographic area, says Brice Semmens, a UW doctoral student in biology and lead author of a paper published in the journal Marine Ecology Progress Series.

Using data on the aquarium trade and shipping traffic, the study is the first to convincingly demonstrate that well-meaning pet owners can cause a "hot spot" of non-native tropical marine fish, Semmens says. The 16 species were found in 32 different locales along the coast of Broward and Palm Beach counties and in the upper Florida Keys. Some were in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.

Most of the species were seen at more than one place meaning more than just a few aquariums have been dumped, Semmens says. It is not clear which, if any, of the non-natives have established breeding populations, he said.


pomancanthus-imperator-lr.jpg

Emperor angelfish, imported by the U.S. aquarium industry in very large numbers, were the most commonly sighted non-native. Photo by Paul Humann.


The more times a species is released, however, the greater the chance of establishment, says Walt Courtenay, fisheries biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Gainesville, Fla., who is known around the world for his expertise on exotic fishes. He is not a co-author of the published paper.

"Typically, I'd say aquarium owners are more concerned with the status of our marine ecosystems than the general public is, yet many appear unaware of the potential pitfalls of releasing pets into the wild," Semmens says.

The study relied on information submitted by volunteer divers and snorkelers through the Exotic Species Sighting Program of the Reef Environmental Education Foundation, or REEF, based in Key Largo, Fla. Sightings were confirmed with photographs, video or corroboration by other divers.

The introduced species are native to the tropical western Pacific and/or Red Sea. Emperor angelfish, with their blue masks and bodies striped in blue and gold, were the most commonly sighted non-native species and are imported by the aquarium industry in relatively large numbers. Indeed, the researchers found a compelling correlation between how commonly ornamental marine species are imported and how often they were sighted. Another commonly sighted non-native was yellow tang, a bright yellow oval fish that is the most commonly imported species of the U.S. aquarium trade.

In contrast, Semmens says it is unlikely the exotics arrived in the ballast water of ships. If the fish were being introduced through ship ballast, one would expect the native ranges of the fish to correlate to where the ballast water comes from. Analyzing data on shipping traffic to Florida ports, Semmens and his co-authors found no support for this correlation.

While only a small number of introduced species might have devastating impacts, scientists are unable to predict which species will be destructive. The largest set of intentionally released marine fish was carried out in temperate coastal and inland seas of Russia in the 20th century. Sixteen species became established, with ecologically and economically devastating results, including harm to valuable fisheries, parasite introductions and the endangerment and extinction of native species.

"Releasing non-native reef fish is like playing Russian roulette with tropical marine ecosystems," Semmens says. Then, too, even if introduced species do not have dramatic impacts, their presence is unnatural and unwanted.

"Divers visit the reefs of Florida to see the region’s natural beauty and diversity. It is a unique and magical experience to dive on these reefs. Adding new species to the region is comparable to adding a few finishing touches to one of da Vinci’s masterpieces."

Co-authors of the paper are Eric Buhle and Anne Salomon, both UW doctoral students in biology, and Christy Pattengill-Semmens, science coordinator for the Reef Environmental Education Foundation.

Aquarium keepers need to be educated about the proper disposition of animals in their care, according to Paul Holthus, executive director and president of the Marine Aquarium Council, an international non-profit organization based in Honolulu that focuses on the way tropical fish are collected and handled before they are purchased.

"While it is against the law to release non-native marine fish into coastal waters, it’s a problem that can’t easily be policed," Semmens says. The authors say that education programs for dealers and aquarists could curtail exotic species introductions if implemented properly. Such programs would need to highlight the problems of introduced species and provide ways for aquarium owners to sell or trade unwanted fish.

emperortif.jpg

This emperor angelfish (Pomacanthus imperator) was documented in Florida by Jason McCullough. Several additional sightings have been reported in the Pompano Beach area.

batandspade.jpg

Introduced orbicular batfish (Platax orbicularis) (top) mingling with Caribbean-native Atlantic spadefish (below) on Molasses Reef, Florida Keys. Photo by REEF member John Stuart.

liontif.jpg

One of the more well known exotic species in the western Atlantic, the red lionfish (Pterois volitans) has been seen from New York to Bermuda to Florida. This picture was taken in Florida by REEF member Joe Froelich.

blueringangel.jpg

This bluering angelfish (Pomacanthus annularis) was documented on a reef near Pompano Beach, Florida by Deborah Devers, Vone Research.

semicircleangel.jpg

The semicircle angelfish (Pomacanthus semicirculatus), also known as the Koran angelfish in the aquarium industry, was photographed by Linda Ianniello in Boca Raton, FL.

goldenangel.jpg

This "golden" angelfish is not an exotic species, but rather a genetic variant of the Atlantic-native queen angelfish (Holacanthus ciliaris). It was photographed by Linda Ianniello in Boca Raton, FL.

yellowbarangel.jpg

The Arabian angelfish (Pomacanthus asfur) was photographed by Tom Ferguson, taken in Dania, FL.

yellowbarangel1.jpg

Here you can see the Arabian angelfish swimming near Atlantic-native tomtate grunts. Photo by Tom Ferguson, taken in Dania, FL.

arabianangel.jpg

The yellowbar angelfish (Pomacanthus maculosus), should not be mistaken as an Arabian angelfish. The location of the yellow marking is farther back on the body and it lacks the blue wash seen on the Arabian's head. This was taken in Pompano Beach by Deborah Devers, Vone Research.

sailfintang.jpg

This sailfin tang (Zebrasoma desjardinii) was photographed off Commercial Pier in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea by REEF member Denise Mizell in the summer of 1999.

sailfintang1.jpg

A different species of sailfin tang (Z. veliferum). Photo by Linda Ianniello, taken at San Remo Reef, Boca Raton.

racoonbutt.jpg

A racoon butterflyfish (Chaetodon lunula) has been sighted a few times on a reef in Boca Raton by a REEF surveyor. (this photo is not from Florida but is shown for identification).

yellowtang1.jpg

A yellow tang (Zebrasoma flavescens) has been sighted by REEF surveyors near Boyton Beach. It can be distinguished from the juvenile phase of the Atlantic-native blue tang by the white spine (blue tang have a yellow spine at all phases of life).

yellowtailtang.jpg

This yellowtail sailfin tang (Zebrasoma xanthurum) was photographed by REEF member Peter Leahy in Boca Raton. It can be distinguished from a transitioning blue tang (one between juvenile and adult) by the lack of the yellow spine.

orangespineunicorn.jpg

An orangespine unicornfish (Naso lituratus) was documented by REEF surveyor Peter Leahy on a reef in Boca Raton.
(this photo is not from Florida but is shown for identification).

moorish.jpg

This moorish idol (Zanclus cornutus) was photographed on a wreck in Pompano Beach by Michael Barnette in the January 2001.

fishmaps.jpg


University of Washington Newsroom: http://www.washington.edu/newsroom/news/2004archive/04-04archive/k040704a.html

Reef Environmental Education Foundation's Exotic Species Sighting Program: http://www.reef.org/exotic
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've never understood the problem with introduced species. How do you tell if it is "unnaturally" introduced?
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Must of been a hurricane release. No one I know is going to dump expensive angels like that. Unless they had extensive lateral line erosion and hole in the head. If they did, it looks like they made a good recovery. Now the panther grouper I can believe. Batfish too. Someone at Marine Ornamentals said there have been reports of black tangs swimming around in Honolulu Harbor. If anyone hears of any hippo tangs on the loose let me know.
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The main problem with introduced exotic species is that they can disrupt the native ecology.

A common way that it occurs is from ship ballast water. But the article states this, in relation to these exotic species: "In contrast, Semmens says it is unlikely the exotics arrived in the ballast water of ships. If the fish were being introduced through ship ballast, one would expect the native ranges of the fish to correlate to where the ballast water comes from. Analyzing data on shipping traffic to Florida ports, Semmens and his co-authors found no support for this correlation."

It would also be expected (I presume) that ballast water would contain other species besides these exotic "aquarium" varieties.

It has been speculated that fish like these may be released by individuals in the recreational dive industry or by divers - for reasons of novelty and attraction.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
John_Brandt":qzl0pdte said:
It has been speculated that fish like these may be released by individuals in the recreational dive industry or by divers - for reasons of novelty and attraction.

This seems highly doubtful. :roll: What are the odds you can train a non-native fish to fish live and hang out in the area where you take your dive tours. You would prolly have to release 1000s just to get to see one once. Very, very expensive proposition with little chance for reward.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The stuff that was there before humans mucked it up. I understand what I think you might be getting at though...

It doesn't take much creativity to imagine how destructive lionfish could be to say, grouper populations. I'm surprised they were in NY, they couldn't possibly have survived through the winter there right?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How bout most all those fish get quit large, like too big for most hobbyists. They didn't say how large those fish were that they found.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Matt_Wandell":31tyipp8 said:
It doesn't take much creativity to imagine how destructive lionfish could be to say, grouper populations. I'm surprised they were in NY, they couldn't possibly have survived through the winter there right?

They have found egg balls and fry so the lions are apparently breeding. Looks like volitans are here to stay.
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
dizzy":33u148xr said:
John_Brandt":33u148xr said:
It has been speculated that fish like these may be released by individuals in the recreational dive industry or by divers - for reasons of novelty and attraction.

This seems highly doubtful. :roll: What are the odds you can train a non-native fish to fish live and hang out in the area where you take your dive tours. You would prolly have to release 1000s just to get to see one once. Very, very expensive proposition with little chance for reward.

What's doubtful is that hurricanes smashed homes (and the aquariums within) and liberated these fish.

What do odds have to do with anything? Many of these fish are territorial and have no instinct to roam in the very first place. The batfish and some of the tangs are semi-nomadic.

Why do you short-sell the motivations and ideals of people of a world of people? And what does cost have to do with it? What if I challenged you with odds by saying - Only one in a couple million people (the population of S. Florida) will buy an emperor angel and dump it in the sea.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Didn't they also do genetic testing of the lionfish they've collected and found many were related? I thought I read that in one of the numerous articles on the subject.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
John_Brandt":h9k1plhm said:
Why do you short-sell the motivations and ideals of people of a world of people? And what does cost have to do with it? What if I challenged you with odds by saying - Only one in a couple million people (the population of S. Florida) will buy an emperor angel and dump it in the sea.

I'd say if you got proof then bring it out, otherwise I'll stick with my gut feeling that it's doutful, and maybe you shouldn't lay the blame on the dive industry. BTW that hurricane theory came from one of the lectures at MO by Todd Gardener (I believe) when we were discussing how the volitans got released. No one knows for sure what happened. Until we do there will be plenty of speculation.
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
dizzy":tust9hwx said:
I'd say if you got proof then bring it out, otherwise I'll stick with my gut feeling that it's doutful, and maybe you shouldn't lay the blame on the dive industry. BTW that hurricane theory came from one of the lectures at MO by Todd Gardener (I believe) when we were discussing how the volitans got released. No one knows for sure what happened. Until we do there will be plenty of speculation.

...and maybe you shouldn't say I'm blaming the dive industry, when I'm not!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Dizzy jump started my memory, it was at the last MANCA that I heard that. I forgot the scientists name, but he had some connection to this. I believe his talk was on coral diseases in FL Keys that he was researching
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While it is quite possible that some fish have been brought in by holes in ships hulls, think about what's going on in Lake Michigan right now with the Zebra Mussels ( though of course these are not fish) these were brought in by ships and are now causing major problems. My guess that most of these fish ( at least the earliest were dump by "Average Joe Aquarist" when the fish became to big or was no longer wanted and they couldn't find a home for it.
Think about the reports you read where Pirahna have been found in lakes and ponds and we shouldn't be amazed that these non-native animals can and do adapt. People keep all types of critters as pets and when longer wanted they just dump them. :cry:

Regards,
David Mohr
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
John_Brandt":2a2ho6cl said:
What do odds have to do with anything? Many of these fish are territorial and have no instinct to roam in the very first place. [/b]

John if these angels always hang out in the same spot it shouldn't be too much of a chore for the angel police to round them up. I would imagine any eco-friendly diver would be happy to report them. Lou Garibaldi of the New York Aquarium told me collectors in the keys tried to intentionally release clownfish in the keys some years ago in hopes of catching offspring later. They didn't survive without host anemones though. If people start flushing rose bubbles, look out.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
These are ADULT fish for the most part that are being found. This isn't exactly news these fish have been seen off the FL coast for years - however the only evidence of breeding has been with the Volitans. I was supposed to write an article on this in conjunction with MIT a couple of years ago for AAOLM but never got around to it. I'm sure if you Google invasive marine species volitans and florida you'll find countless articles on it. There is a Dive Group in FL thats been recording this for quite some time. They are being introduced by aquarists there is no doubt in my mind.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
davidmohr":2is33j0k said:
While it is quite possible that some fish have been brought in by holes in ships hulls, think about what's going on in Lake Michigan right now with the Zebra Mussels ( though of course these are not fish) these were brought in by ships and are now causing major problems. My guess that most of these fish ( at least the earliest were dump by "Average Joe Aquarist" when the fish became to big or was no longer wanted and they couldn't find a home for it.
Think about the reports you read where Pirahna have been found in lakes and ponds and we shouldn't be amazed that these non-native animals can and do adapt. People keep all types of critters as pets and when longer wanted they just dump them. :cry:

Regards,
David Mohr

most, if not all, of the press stories about piranha found in u.s. lakes/ponds have been shown to have been Pacu, or metynnis (silver dollar) species, and not piranha, iirc :wink:
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top