MaryHM wrote:
Chip, it's easy to understand. None of the "save a reef- ban the MO industry" people in here have a link to the food fish world. That goes on everyday and they don't hear about it, don't have a live food fish tank in their house that they pull fish out of for dinner, don't go to a live food fish resturant, don't hang out with people who share an interest in eating live reef fish, etc... They think that as long as they have no contact with detrimental reef practices, that it isn't occurring. Out of sight, out of mind.
Wrong again Mary.
Those who will be responsible for closure of the MO industry are not the "save a reef people" it is the industry itself by it lack of action on reeform. And you know this to be true.
:roll:MaryHM":6l9svgjl said:Again, where did I say they were responsible for anything? NO WHERE. Let me try to spell it out even more remedially for you:
I am categorizing a type of person. A person who thinks that if the MO trade were to vanish tomorrow the reefs would be saved. This person doesn't have to have any involvement in reform or any involvement in trying to shut the trade down. They just have to have a mindset. A mindset that thinks legislation that will ban the MO trade will have a positive impact on the reefs. IT IS A MINDSET, NOT AN ACTION.
MaryHM":2xmo5x4i said:Jaime,
The reason I asked you for a timeline is because you yourself stated that this bill would force the industry to do something. That's all I was focusing on- if the bill became law how long would it take for the forced industry to complete its task? Your answer: 3-5 years. I'd say 5 years is a fairly realistic timeline for cleaning up SOME of the major issues. Of course, MAC has been trying to get a CDT together for how long and that hasn't even happened. And that's something that's not under another country's governmental control. My point is this. If the bill becomes law and industry is forced to finally do something, how is industry going to afford to do it? This bill would effectively shut down the industry. If that happens, I highly doubt the people whose businesses are closed are going to put out money for the next 3-5 years in hopes that something will happen to get it running again. I agree that something should have been done already. But I don't agree that this bill would force industry to change it's ways. As is, it would just close the industry. And closing the industry would not put us any closer to getting healthy reefs than we were before.
marillion":r9d2fty4 said:MaryHM":r9d2fty4 said:And closing the industry would not put us any closer to getting healthy reefs than we were before.
If so many divers depend on the industry to feed their families, why wouldn't they just switch over to the food industry since it's the same skills used? Why would this bill make an impact on the reefs if OUR industry is shut down? There's another, much larger industry out there that does the SAME thing, right?
I don't get it.
Peace,
Chip
Jaime Baquero":189vp71h said:marillion":189vp71h said:MaryHM":189vp71h said:And closing the industry would not put us any closer to getting healthy reefs than we were before.
If so many divers depend on the industry to feed their families, why wouldn't they just switch over to the food industry since it's the same skills used? Why would this bill make an impact on the reefs if OUR industry is shut down? There's another, much larger industry out there that does the SAME thing, right?
I don't get it.
Peace,
Chip
To begin with... let's fix one, the one you are directly involved, the one that has been ripping off the coral reefs and exploiting the fisherfolks for decades, and then, together we will put pressure to work on the other one.
The status quo can not be an option for people who really care about coral reefs. There are many thing in this trade that are wrong .