• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

Douglas S Lehman

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello from Chicago
We (you) may be working the problem backwords? Why does eveyone seem to think we need to get the price down on clean MO to compete with the crappy (juiced) fish supply? Does anybody know who collects, exports, and imports these fish and where do they end up? I can tell you they never land here (ORD) as all the LFS I stop at sware up and down "we don't sell them here"!
 

naesco

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Douglas S Lehman":3iykp5ay said:
Hello from Chicago
We (you) may be working the problem backwords? Why does eveyone seem to think we need to get the price down on clean MO to compete with the crappy (juiced) fish supply? Does anybody know who collects, exports, and imports these fish and where do they end up? I can tell you they never land here (ORD) as all the LFS I stop at sware up and down "we don't sell them here"!

Industry knows specifically who is part of the cyanide cartel in the Philippines and Indonesia and which companies are importing from them.
IMO is is just a matter of time before the whistle is blown on them.

If you find out from the LFS that the fish you bought were from the Philippines or Indonesia, the chances are that they were caught with cyanide as the use of cyanide in those two countries is rampant.

It also depends on the species of fish and the wholesaler.

There are excellent wholesalers who try their best to avoid these countries and known cyanide suppliers.

I think it is OK to ask here who these leaders in the industry are.

Welcome again to the industry forum. You can really make a difference here so please continue to post.
Thank you
 

Caterham

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How are you involved in the trade of marine ornamentals? How many animals do you tank on a weekly basis? What is the average DOA rate that you personally experience from your imports?

Many thanks in advance for your reply.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Caterham":3g7uioev said:
How are you involved in the trade of marine ornamentals? How many animals do you tank on a weekly basis? What is the average DOA rate that you personally experience from your imports?

Many thanks in advance for your reply.

Are you aiming those at Doug or Wayne? Knowing Doug myself, I can say he's a 1%er in this hobby. He's got more experience with these animals then I ever hope to achieve :D One need not be a store owner, nor a wholesaler to know fish. I bet he spends nearly the same amount of time at his LFS tromping grounds then most employees of them :lol:
 

Douglas S Lehman

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Caterham":2jyaukng said:
How are you involved in the trade of marine ornamentals? How many animals do you tank on a weekly basis? What is the average DOA rate that you personally experience from your imports?

Many thanks in advance for your reply.

Hello
IF this is directed toward me, I'm the one with all the power! Im just a lowly hobbiest of 30 years looking for some good fish...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Git 'im Caterham! ;) :lol:

Wayne... - Care to answer the Q please?
 

JennM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm not presuming to speak for Caterham, but I've seen him pose the same question to Wayne in another thread. The way I read it is that he's posing the question to him.

As to the original question - yep, I've heard the same thing from every LFS and wholesaler I've ever dealt with. Some can back up their claims, some can't. At the end of the day a lot of it is a leap of faith. Looking at the country of origin for many species, for those wholesalers that list the country of origin, will rule out a lot of stuff... there are plenty of places that fish are collected cleanly, and shopping the wholesalers that stock those fish give you the best odds, IMO.

Nobody can say with 100% certainty that all their fish are cleanly caught, but a savvy buyer can get close.

Jenn
 

JennM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
naesco":v3uwlt8p said:
Industry knows specifically who is part of the cyanide cartel in the Philippines and Indonesia and which companies are importing from them.
IMO is is just a matter of time before the whistle is blown on them.

Actually, Wayne, you'd be surprised how many LFS owners and staff are ignorant of this issue. 20 years ago I was told by a *good* LFS that ordered carefully and conscientiously, that this problem was being addressed then - and I suppose it was to some extent, but the issue still exists today. Many hobbyists are also blissfully ignorant of this fact, even though the book I sell 4 copies of each week has a detailed chapter on the Cyanide issue. Each week I open somebody's eyes to it through conversations. The whistle *has* been blown a long time ago, but nobody appears to have heard it. Or at least very few have heard it.

If you find out from the LFS that the fish you bought were from the Philippines or Indonesia, the chances are that they were caught with cyanide as the use of cyanide in those two countries is rampant.

You also can't paint every wholesaler or exporter or importer with the same brush. There *are* cleanly caught fish out there, even from those areas. The supposed boycott of the PI and Indo that you keep pushing, would also put those net catchers out of business too. Is that your agenda?

It also depends on the species of fish and the wholesaler.

Indeed. Would you care to share your knowledge as to what's likely to be net-caught, and what isn't? Particularly from PI and Indo? And how about your experience with wholesalers in this regard? I'm sure many of us here can benefit from knowing what is OK and what isn't based on your direct experience in this regard.

There are excellent wholesalers who try their best to avoid these countries and known cyanide suppliers.

Yes, there are. Care to share who they are with us?

I have a question, Wayne... is it preferable to you for the industry to over-harvest a specie cleanly, so it's "suitable" for the trade (according to you), or to harvest *sustainably* (cleanly) a variety of fishes, some of which *you* deem unsuitable?

I don't believe there's any way to whitewash harmful collection techniques.

However, would it be more "ok" to harvest yellow tangs to the point of them being vulnerable in the wild, because they're a no-brainer that's caught cleanly, or harvesting a larger variety that includes some of the ones that *you* feel can't be kept?

Octopus and other cephlapods live a short lifespan - does that make them unsuitable to you? Or is it because they are venomous? If it's because they are venomous, then you'd better expand your list to include quite a number of snakes and reptiles too. Plenty of people keep creatures that are potentially dangerous. It's not my cup of tea, but if somebody chooses to keep something like that, and they're capable of providing for its needs, why should you or anybody else stop them? (There's that Canadian vs. American attitude again - Canadians need to be legislated to death and have the government coddle them, where Americans just want the government to stay the heck out of their business!)

While the blue ringed octopus is on your list, I didn't see stonefish on there... why not? Where do you draw the line? Lethal? Potentially lethal? Heck even some tangs can make you feel the burn if you're cut by them - gonna ban those too? What if somebody's tagged by something that should just "hurt" but they turn out to be allergic and die of anaphalactic shock because they didn't have their epi pen? Too many "what ifs"...

What about Zoanthids? I know you're talking about a "USL" for fish, but since we're talking about toxic and venomous things that you deem dangerous, how about the fact that Zoanthids are among the most toxic creatures out there? Their toxin is much more potent than that of the blue ring... although people are usually exposed to lesser concentrations of palytoxin than they are from a blue ring bite, hence lethal exposures are fewer and further between. I know quite a few people who have poisoned themselves handling zoanthids... and I haven't heard of anyone being tagged by a blue ring (at least not around here and not recently).

I don't carry Moorish Idol, but if somebody with a large reef tank wanted one, aware that they are a challenging creature, why shouldn't I be able to order them one?

What about Mandarins? They are "challenging" too, but provided a larger tank with well-established fauna, they thrive for years... but I didn't see those on your list, even though they die by the hundreds or even thousands at the hands of ignorant hobbyists. Should I not have been able to keep one for the past 3 years, because some dummies put them in a barren 10-gallon?

If "hobbyist ignorance" is a reason to ban many of these fish, then you may as well shut down the entire industry because the ignorant hobbyists far outnumber the educated ones. This is NOT a potshot at hobbyists - it's an unfortunate fact. And for anyone that doubts me on this, there's an open invitation to spend a day or three with me at my shop, fielding questions like, "Will this blue one (P. hepatus) go with my goldfish?" (A man asked that Saturday). Responsible LFS spend time educating people and encouraging them to educate themselves, but you can't make the horse drink the water. Even when I refuse to sell to them on the basis of inappropriateness of the tank they provide, or bad water quality or whatever, the most ignorant ones just go someplace else, or online, where people don't ask questions. Then they're back in to see me when they have big problems, because they *know* I care enough to help them fix them, even if they're embarrassed about their own ignorance - and half the time they aren't even ashamed of their own stupidity. It's a curse really, but it happens all the time. Wayne, I invited you to come and experience this for yourself a long time ago, but you've never taken me up on the invite. It still stands. Come on down and see for yourself.

And people here have blasted me for requesting a sample of people's tank water to test before I blindly bag up a fish :roll: Ask some people if they have freshwater or saltwater tank, and they aren't sure. Sometimes it's necessary to test just to find out. WalMart and PetsMart and PetCo generally don't ask before they bag up a fish, now do they?

Wayne, I know that somehow your heart is in the right place, but unless you have personally spent time in this trade, dealing with its issues firsthand, you really cannot presume to know its nuances.

Respectfully,

Jenn
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
naesco":4whhhjjf said:
Me, OK, I too am a concerned hobbyist. And you? :)
Thank you
Wayne
I don't think I've ever made it look like anything other... ;)
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jenn accurately wrote;
"If "hobbyist ignorance" is a reason to ban many of these fish, then you may as well shut down the entire industry because the ignorant hobbyists far outnumber the educated ones. This is NOT a potshot at hobbyists - it's an unfortunate fact."

But Jenn,
The Eco-label and certification schemes rely on rising a groundswell of educated hobbyists to insist on the sustainably caught livestock.
This notion has eclipsed the more practical and viable ones to the point of monopolizing the options percieved by the reform movement.
Although it is the experience of every dealer....[that the trade is incorrigibly driven by baser consumer motives] it has all been ignored by the new cabal of reform groups.
Relying on a critical mass of responsible hobbyists to then drive the equation....is what is depended on and what anchors the chance to get it right.

Importers and dealers who totally agree are funded not to.
Selling out to certain failure in exchange for some image enhancement points is the very essence of the public relations trade yet this is slightly more important then the choice between coke or pepsi...isn't it?

Dealers who live by the consumer whim and whimsey are disappointed routinely....in turn, importers deal daily with dealers who clearly do not want to act upon enlightened choices when offered.
Responsible , environmentally oriented fish folks numbers are small...and in % to the consumptive, price driven mobs....remain small.
Pegging it all on a rising consumer revolution in responsible thinking based on intelligent and informed choices is something he inventors of the scheme would not and do not even abide by themselves!
They wouldn't do it as hobbyists ....nor have they seen it and yet the final decades or so to get it right are all on this roll of the dice.
Steve

[Public aquariums offer responsible menus without Chilean seabass in their restaurants while exhibiting cyanide fishes routinely. If they won't cotton to it...who will?}
ps. # 2...
I have delt fishes in the San Francisco Bay area for many years and even this alledged hotbed of eco-correct consumer choice is not to be given control of any sustainable future by relying on their decisions to support eco-labeling in tropicals.
Tuna vs dolphin...yes.
Canadians clubbing white fur seals...ok...
The rest ...no..
 

naesco

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very thoughtful post, Jenn. (Oilers up 3-zip).

Steve has on a number of times posted those species of fish that or likely cyanide caught and those that are not and the reasons why. Would you enlighten us one more time Steve?

If you subscribe to the view that it just does not make sense removing from the oceans species of fish and coral that have no reasonable hope of success in hobbyist tanks than here is how a USL( Unsuitable species List) might work using the MAC/REEFCHECK/CCIF as a conduit for example.
1. The species would be identified as such.
2. The fishers would be educated not ot remove these fish and coral.
3.They would not appear on exporter/importer/wholesaler listings.
4. If a university, researcher, or expert wished to place and order for a species on the list they should be allowed to do so and the wholesaler would provide it to him/her as a special order.

I believe that people who choose to keep octopus (I no nothing about them but assume they are difficult to keep) should have the right to do so and to be able to order them including the blue ring.
But, I strongly believe that they should not be available for sale in LFS, sold by vendors who no nothing about their care to hobbyist that do not have the knowledge no the means to keep them sucessfully. In other words, they should be available on special order. Ditto for Moorish Idol, goniopora and all the species of fish and coral that me all know have no reasonable success in hobbyist tanks.

It seems to me that this is a very reasonabe approach to a problem that give industry a black eye.
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The USL is a red herring Wayne.
Regulating it by law...by law with enforcement and budget for enforcement? Ain't gonna happen so what is the exercise for again?
To show who cares the most?
Count me out.
See Jenns explaination between American and Canadian notions of government responsibility...
Steve
HABITAT DESTRUCTION IS FOR ME 99% OF THE ISSUE,
The rest, pretty small potatos.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Let's hope the MAC swept out the person who came up with this silly notion during one of the "house cleaning" events. They are miles ahead by sticking to sustainability issues.
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Right Mitch,
Especially if those sustainabilty issues pertain to actual collection sites where fish collecting takes place...and in particular where certified activity is said to take place and where the reefs were deemed strong enough [ by someone] to sustain collecting on a commercial level...
Steve
 

JennM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Once again, and respectfully, Wayne, your lack of experience in this trade is showing again.

The concept of "by order" fishes (ie: not order Idols etc) is woefully misguided. If a fisherman who depends on his daily catch to feed his family, sees a fish that will help him pay today's expenses, he's going to catch it if he can. Somebody *will* buy it.

Just because I think I can sell 10 P. hepatus this week, and I order them because they're on an availability list, doesn't mean I'll get them either. Perhaps the wholesaler *expected* 150 of them, but they didn't come, or some came DOA, or they were in bad shape so the wholesaler won't resell them, or whatever. Perhaps other customers were quicker to submit their order and they got all the saleable ones that the wholesaler had. This isn't as much about "supply and demand" as you might think. Demand might be there, but supply might not be. I've been looking for a Dactylopus dactylopus for about 3 years now for a hobbyist who's qualified to keep one, but I've yet to see one on an availability list with anyone I'm currently buying from. Yet Mandarins and Scooters are seemingly always available.

In a nutshell, divers catch what they can. Just because there's a demand for x number of y species, doesn't mean they're going to find them, so the concept of sending an "order request" right back to the village level, is somewhat unrealistic, IMO. I believe this notion has been discussed at length before.

In order to sit in your armchair to quarterback this trade, you need to be experienced in it. That's the way it is.

And furthermore... what you, in your opinion, may be "unsuitable" today, may not be in 6 months or a year from now, *because* hobbyists and researchers are working with different species to find out how to keep them thriving in captivity.

20 years ago when I started seeing live coral available in the store I shopped at, we used to chuckle and leave it there for the "rich folks" to buy because we *knew* it wouldn't last long-term. Well guess what? Since then, people have learned how to keep many of these, and even propagate them. If they'd been banned for being "unsuitable", then nobody would have the opportunities now that they do to have healthy growing coral reefs in their home tanks.

Your proposed "USL" is very subjective and does not take anything into consideration vis a vis *who* is buying what. As I've said before, I don't stock Mandarins, but I'll certainly order one for a hobbyist who has a suitable environment, since we know what it takes to keep these magnificent little fish. My role in the "conservation" part of this is to help ensure that the hobbyist succeeds with it. However you can apply that way of thinking (and I do) to every fish from the lowly damsel right on up.

It's simple economics for me. If I blindly bag up anything and everything without making sure the hobbyist has a clue, if they don't have a clue, they'll kill a bunch of stuff really quickly and next thing their tank will be in their next yard sale. Poof - no more revenue from that customer. It's in my own best financial interest (and my moral interest) to help the customer educate himself, so that he stays in the hobby for a good long time, thus keeping the money pumping into my own economy. That's where I may be different from the anonymous corporation that just has a kid bag 'em and sell 'em as fast as he can. But I digress...

If not for hobbyists educating themselves and trying new things to help long-term survival of challenging species, the hobby will just stagnate, and so will the trade.

IMO your time and effort would be better spent on looking at better overall capture methods, handling methods and **sustainable** collection of any or all species that are collected for the trade. Once a fish leaves the reef, it's ecologically dead to the ocean, whether it lives for 2 minutes or 20 years. If one hobbyist kills 10 of them, or if 10 hobbyists each keep one alive for 20 years, it makes no difference - the fish is "dead" as far as the ocean is concerned, the moment it leaves the water.

Jenn
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I propose the following new listing terminology;
USL.....hmmm
Unsuitable Species List
Unsuitable Species List For Me
Unsuitable Species List For You
Unsuitable Species List For Funders Purporting To Fix A Trade They Don't Understand or USLFFPTFATTDU
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Drew Weiner has the right idea with his fish lists. Just advise hobbyists which fish are easy or difficult and leave it at that.
Mitch
 

JennM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
cortez marine":bzu1ybmn said:
I propose the following new listing terminology;
USL.....hmmm
Unsuitable Species List
Unsuitable Species List For Me
Unsuitable Species List For You
Unsuitable Species List For Funders Purporting To Fix A Trade They Don't Understand or USLFFPTFATTDU

ROFL!

Jenn
 

JennM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
dizzy":8je1k9e2 said:
Drew Weiner has the right idea with his fish lists. Just advise hobbyists which fish are easy or difficult and leave it at that.
Mitch

I concur. Also, Scott Michael's Marine Fishes book is a good guide too- I recommend it to many hobbyists and I have a dog-eared copy or two myself which I often refer to. While I don't agree with 100% of the info in it (sometimes things are just subjective), it's a great guidline for would-be buyers of any given fish, to look it up and read the page of info on each one. Right there in a nutshell is the common and Latin name of the fish, its maximum size, minimum aquarium size, captive care, and reef compatibility as well as information on where it's native to and any other relevant information. It also has an easy 1-5 hardiness scale. 4s and 5s are generally no-brainers, 3s you need a bit more savvy and 1s and 2s are usually to be avoided except by folks who are willing to take on the challange.

But there we go trying to *educate* the consumer again ;)

Jenn
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top