It costs a lot of money to be in a brick and mortar, to be in the publics face as they go about their day to day lives. It costs a lot of dollars to be in a position to create hobbyists. And creating hobbyists is what its all about.Thales":1wj3dd5o said:I'm really not sure what B&M's are so worried about because they will always have customers that etail won't have. .
Price wise its not possible to compete with low over head e-tailers.
And from what Ive heard even etailers dont make money.
From a cost perspective, the three fish stores in my area of Atlanta have a combined expenses of over 27 thousand bucks a month JUST IN RENT! Thats a higher rental expense then any of the wholesalers in LOS Angeles.
When online stores steal customers , not having to share in the cost of creating hobbyists is an unfair advantage. Its like pirating software or movies. It costs 200 million to make a flick and 20 cents for some SOB tto make a dvd copy of it.
Mark my words: the music industry is on its last leg, the web has sucked out all the profits in making music.
A few more gigs of dSL bandwith and when the average American can down load a full feature HD film for free on the web, bypassing the movie houses altogether......the film industry will not have the profits to produce big films.
Imagine if High schools and Collage team sports weren't around and didn't generate interest in professional sports. If pro teams had to create ball players out of the average Joe on the street. How much more would teams be forces to raise ticket prices if the farm leagues had to do what schools and little league does with weeding out prospective future stars from the masses.