Reply to Mitch Gibbs (Dizzy)
First let me explain that I not trying to stop anyone from having an opinion on these matters. I hope that you will respect that my opinion and that of the IMA is based on over 15 years with the IMA dealing with these problems in the Philippines and over 10 years in Indonesia. We have been an NGO in Vietnam (anoter place where cyanide use is rampant) for the past three years. Each country has unique cultures and IMA tries to deal with this by employing citizens of these countries. So, we are not insensitive or out of touch with the needs of these countries and/or their desire to manage their own affairs.
With regard to Horge, I am not convinced he is a Filipino. If he is, he is well educated and has spent a good deal of time in other countries like the USA. I disagree with his viewpoint concerning the need for the use of drugs to collect either aquarium fishes or food fishes. If he has some chemical that he thinks would work, he should discuss the specifics rather than vague generalities for the need to evaluate narcotics and/or barbutates/natual products. Being Filipino does not make him an expert on any of these chemical compounds more than anyone else.
As far as Jaime Baquero he is from Columbia and is a Canadian citizen. I respect his views about the Philippines. However, I don't see him advocating the use of drugs for collecting either marine aquarium fish or food fish species.
The IMA delevoped a training program called HALD. This stands for Hook And Line Decompression. Fishermen were trained how to use hand lines with baited hooks for capturing groupers alive. I helped to introduce a special needle (developed by SeaGrant in Florida) for deflating the swim bladders of groupers. This was applied successfully on the Island of Busuanga (a center for the grouper trade in the Philippines). About 250 food fishermen received HALD training from IMA at various locations throughout the Philippines under the USAID sponsored Community Empowerment Program from 1998-2000.
So, I don't see that there is a need for a drug for capturing food fish as Kalk has suggested. I might also add that fishing with any kind of chemical compound is illegal in the Philippines under Presidential Decree 704 and now under the new Fisheries Act of 1998. The Act states
"If shall be unlawful for any person to catch, take, or gather or cause to be caught, taken or gathered fish or any fishery species in Philippine waters with the use of electricity, explosives, noxious or poisonous substance such as sodium cyanide in the Philippines fishery areas, which will kill, stupefy, disable or render unconscious fish or fishery species" Exceptions were made for the use of chemicals for research, educational, or scientific purposes; or to eradicate predators in fishponds provided the practice is conducted in an acceptable manner without causing adverse environmental impact in neighboring waters and fishing grounds.
I am not as fully versed with the laws in Indonesia. I believe it is illegal to use drugs like cyanide. Erdmann pointed out one loophole where cyanide is considered to be a sedating agent for shipment of food fish. The IMA does not make the laws in any of these countries. We were successful in getting the Philippine Bureau of Fisheries And Aquatic Resources (BFAR) to pass a Fisheries Administrative Order (FAO) in 1986 that made an exception to the law against the the use of fine-mesh nets. This allows the capture of aquarium fish with fine-mesh nets (like barrier nets). As far as I know. this still applies under the new Fisheries Act. So, IMA's position concerning the use of nets for collecting aquarium fish is consistent with Philippine laws whereas the use of drugs is not.
Groupers can be captured in a variety of ways such as with traps and/or various nets. There is no need for drugs to capture either aquarium fish or food fish.
Sincerely,
Peter Rubec
International Marinelife Alliance