• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

mkirda

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Kalkbreath":3tbcpl7v said:
Bet you didnt know Kalk would support a ban on big fish collecting!

I would be shocked (I think) if you didn't. Big, older fish can outproduce even slightly smaller fish by a very large number. IIRC, in some species in can be 10x more egg production.
You need these fish to replenish the reef. You must protect the spawning aggregation sites, else you "eat the seed corn."

Food fishermen can make a killing at these areas, and kill their future earnings, all at the same time.

Regards.
Mike Kirda
 

mkirda

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
dizzy":3lk1iewy said:
Mike did you read the last MAC quarterly report? Apparently one of the exporters did lose MAC certification. All and all I think this past report was probably the most honest, tell it like it really is, report that I've read so far. Kudos to MAC for that.
Mitch

Hey, Mitch.

From this post, I decided to go read the newsletter. I can't see what it is that you are talking about. Are you talking about '05, first quarter newsletter? If so, what page or heading?
Am very tired, so maybe I missed it in my first two read-throughs.

Regards.
Mike Kirda
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Mitch, please post a link :D Does it mention their house cleaning in PI?
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
International Certification for the Quality and Sustainability
of Marine Aquarium Organisms . from Reef to Retail

MAC News 2nd Quarter 2005

Director's Note

MAC's efforts to instill quality and sustainability as the foundation for the collection, handling and holding of marine ornamentals and the management of collection areas in rural areas of developing countries is based on the work of many dedicated individuals. The MAC trainers, community organizers and other field staff, and those working with exporters, put in an enormous commitment of time and effort to work with collectors and communities to understand and achieve MAC Certification. Many MAC staff members spend weeks and sometimes months away from their families to work in these areas and form a working partnership with the community and the collectors to build their capacity to attain MAC Certification. These efforts are often fraught with unpredictable difficulties of bad weather, local and national politics, logistics problems, etc that interfere with planned, timely progress. Nonetheless, as reported below, these efforts are achieving results with many new collection areas, collectors groups and exporters achieving MAC Certification in the past month.

MAC tries its best to build the capacity for a collection area, collectors group or exporter to achieve understanding and compliance with the international standards. However, it is important to note that assessment for compliance is undertaken by independent third party MAC Accredited Certifiers and a positive result is not certain - as noted below for some of the recent assessments. When a collection area fails certification the effect can have a major impact on those involved. For example, in the Philippines a collection area recently did not 'pass' their assessment. Members of the community and collectors group were reduced to tears when they learned their hard work over the past year had not been up to the standards. MAC does not and will not give up on these communities if there is continued commitment on the part of the collectors and community to persevere towards achieving MAC Certification. We continue to work even harder to ensure that the community and the collectors have the information, skills and experience to achieve a successful certification result in the future.

CERTIFICATION PROGRESS

Major New Certifications and Re-Certifications in Philippines and Fiji and
First Certifications in Indonesia

During the month of May a MAC Accredited certifier assessment team visited a large number of collection areas and exporters in the Philippines and Indonesia. An additional assessment took place in Fiji in early June 2005. In the three countries, a total of 17 new or previously MAC Certified collection areas and associated collectors groups were assessed and 17 new or previously MAC Certified exporters were assessed. The results of this major effort and many months of extreme hard work by MAC staff and the certifier were:

PHILIPPINES
1. MAC Ecosystem and Fishery Management (EFM) Standard and MAC Collection, Fishing and Holding (CFH) Standard
A. New collection areas and associated collectors groups:
- 12 new collection areas and associated collectors groups were assessed
- 11 new collection areas and associated collectors groups were successfully MAC Certified
- 1 new collection area and associated collectors group was unsuccessful
B. Existing Certified collection areas and associated collectors groups:
- 2 previously MAC Certified collection areas and associated collectors groups were assessed
- 2 previously MAC Certified collection areas and associated collectors groups were successfully re-Certified

2. MAC Handling, Husbandry and Transport (HHT) Standard
A. New exporters:
- 7 new exporters were assessed
- 7 new exporters were successfully MAC Certified
B. Existing Certified exporters:
- 3 previously MAC Certified exporters were assessed
- 2 previously MAC Certified exporters were successfully re-Certified
- 1 previously MAC Certified exporter was unsuccessful

INDONESIA - First ever MAC Certification assessment and successful certifications
1. MAC EFM Standard and MAC CFH Standard
A. New collection areas and associated collectors groups:
- 2 new collection areas and associated collectors groups were assessed
- 1 new collection area and associated collectors group was successfully MAC Certified
- 1 new collection area and associated collectors group was unsuccessful

2. MAC HHT Standard
A. New exporters:
- 6 new exporters were assessed
- 6 new exporters were successfully MAC Certified

FIJI
1. MAC EFM Standard and MAC CFH Standard
A. New collection areas and associated collectors groups:
- 1 new collection area and associated collectors group was assessed
- 1 new collection area and associated collectors group was successfully MAC Certified

2. MAC HHT Standard
A. New exporters:
- 1 new exporter was assessed
- 1 new exporter was successfully MAC Certified

As always, the only formal listing of MAC Certified areas, collectors and companies is available on the MAC website. This listing will soon be updated to include all of the above.

As we move forward with the continued and expanded supply-side efforts to develop MAC Certified collection areas, collectors and exporters, the major focus will also be on ensuring that there is a consistent flow of high quality MAC Certified organisms of increasing volume and variety from these areas and new areas that achieve MAC Certification.

INDONESIA UPDATE

Government Supports Sustainability and Information for Indonesia's Aquarium Trade

During a MAC presentation to the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affairs in Jakarta last May, the Indonesian Government expressed enthusiasm about MAC's work in Indonesia, including MAC's efforts to help in collating data on organisms collected for marine aquarium trade. Although the aquarium trade has been operating for over 30 years in the country, there are limited records available for the trade.

The Indonesian government is becoming increasingly aware of the need to conserve its marine natural resources to achieve sustainable use over the long term. It has welcomed MAC's efforts in helping to compile data about the species in trade, particularly from the designated collection areas. Regular surveys of collection areas are carried out by Reef Check and other local NGO partners, in areas seeking to be certified with the data being compiled by MAC. These baseline data can then be compared with subsequent data, and used to monitor harvest, develop catch levels, and identify potential species at risk. Although the marine aquarium trade has a relatively minor impact on coral reefs in comparison other uses, there has been increasing pressure for Indonesia to monitor the species and numbers in trade, in order to provide greater legal protection to species found to be at risk through over-exploitation. At present, this monitoring still mainly focuses on the collection and trade in live and dead corals, as most marine aquarium fish and invertebrates are not protected.

Enlightened and committed industry members have begun to respond to this, and have approached MAC to help them. There has been a dramatic shift towards coral cultivation, and the mariculture of marine organisms will be an important part of achieving greater sustainability for the marine aquarium trade. These efforts by government and the industry can contribute significantly in providing good quality organisms for the market, lowering mortality of species in trade, and enhancing the conservation to the reefs upon which so many people depend for their livelihoods. Given the sensitivity about the collection areas' specific location, the trust of all traders who are willing to share their data is greatly appreciated, and the confidentiality of all data collected is respected.

PHILIPPINES UPDATE

MAC Strengthens Focus on Supply Development

The strategic focus of MAC on transforming the marine aquarium trade, especially for supply development in key source countries, is evident in the recent move to strengthen its program and project delivery capability in Asia/Pacific region. In May 2005, MAC moved into new Manila offices that it will share with key partners Reef Check and the Conservation and Community Investment Forum (CCIF). The office is being ramped up to provide managerial, technical and administrative support services for its Philippines-based operations, and for MAC in Indonesia, with a view to extending this support to the MAC efforts in the Asia/Pacific region overall. "We need to extend our reach to the coastal communities and exporters that are fundamental to the trade, and having a more solid presence in these countries is part of sustaining effective programs at this level" stressed Paul Holthus, Executive Director for MAC.

MAC is able to expand its efforts in the Philippines and Indonesia through "Marine Aquarium Market Transformation Initiative" (MAMTI) support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) via the International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank. As previously reported, the MAMTI project brings together a complementary partnership between MAC, Reef Check and CCIF and the office a vibrant and unique mix of skills and talent. Juliet Paulino, the MAC Asia/Pacific Office Manager adds: "We are serious, but we are going to make the work enjoyable" as she develops a user-friendly office environment which will make a remarkable contribution to achieving MAC's global objectives

Contact information for the new MAC office in Manila is:
Marine Aquarium Council
6th Floor, Salustiana D. Ty Tower
104 Paseo de Roxas
Makati City, Metro Manila
Philippines
Ph: +632 813-1308; + 632 893-7252
Fax: +632 817-9541
E-mail: [email protected]

Philippines President Visits MAC Collectors in Palawan

On 9 May, 2005, local communities of the Palawan region received the visit of Philippines President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, accompanied by Palawan Governor Joel Reyes and US Ambassador to the Philippines, Francis Ricciardones. The President and other officials met with marine ornamentals collectors who are working towards becoming MAC Certified.

Since 2004, the Palawan region has hosted MAC training teams, through the USAID support to MAC for "Transforming the Marine Aquarium Trade" (TMAT). Several communities and collectors groups in Palawan Province are working towards achieving compliance with the MAC International Standards for both their collection areas and operations.

PACIFIC UPDATE

Canadian/South Pacific and EC SMART Projects Draw to an End

Generous support from the Canada-South Pacific Ocean Development Program (C-SPOD), via the South Pacific Forum Secretariat, wrapped up in late 2004, as the project funding period ended. In mid 2005, the Sustainable Management of Aquarium Reef Trade (SMART) project funded by the European Commission will be finishing up as that project cycle closes. These projects sought to ensure the marine aquarium fishery and industry in several Pacific Island countries was environmentally, economically and socially sound and sustainable through MAC Certification. MAC was active in Fiji, Vanuatu, Tonga, the Solomon Islands, Kiribati and the Cook Islands. Although significant progress has been made in all of these areas, there is still work to be done. Difficult logistics, changes in company management, national political developments, community concerns, and other issues greatly affected the ability to move fully through to MAC Certification for many of the collection areas and companies.

MAC Certification Focus on Christmas Island, Kiribati

MAC activities in the Pacific will continue, but on a much more targeted scale. Through support of the Brussels-based Centre for the Development of Enterprise, the MAC Pacific team will be following up on the interest in MAC Certification from the collectors and exporters in Christmas Island, Kiribati. The team will be based at Christmas Island for much of July and August 2005.

SPREP Support for Resource Assessment and Management

The South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) provided support to enable the MAC Pacific team to focus on the information and processes needed to ensure that the live coral and live rock trade could be better understood and managed. The MAC Pacific program linked this to fieldwork and undertook additional activities including: refining the resource assessment methodology for live coral harvesting and live rock extraction, improving methods for the interpretation of resource assessments and developing quota building capacity to undertake resource assessments, and developing impact assessment methods.

EUROPE UPDATE

European Importers and Retailers Prepare for Certification Assessment

Interest within Europe for MAC Certification is growing rapidly amongst importers and retailers. MAC Consultant, Christiane Schmidt, has been working closely with importers and retailers in France, Germany and the UK over the past months to assist them to prepare for MAC Certification to the MAC HHT Standard. Several importers and retailers in these countries are scheduled to be formally assessed by a MAC Accredited certifier in July 2005.

MAC Seminar and Presentations at the Paris Underwater Life Festival

In April, MAC representatives attended the second edition of the Underwater Life Festival in Paris, France (previously "CIRCOP"). This is one of France's major marine aquarium industry and hobby events, which occurs every two years. The Festival generously provided support for MAC participation and booth space for MAC to display its brochures for hobbyists and the industry, which provided a busy meeting place for MAC interaction with participants, speakers and organizers.

In addition to a plenary presentation on "Healthy Reefs, Healthy Hobby - a Symbiotic Relationship", a forum for hobbyists was held on MAC Certification, with many questions from the reef keepers in attendance. The Festival also hosted a half-day MAC Certification seminar for the industry on the MAC Standards and the steps to follow to become MAC Certified, targeting French aquarium industry professionals. Several companies signed the MAC Statement of Commitment and Support at the event.

European Press Interest in MAC at ZooMark, Italy

MAC Communications Consultant, Nathalie Gamain, attended ZooMark (the second largest pet industry trade show in Europe) in Bologna, Italy to meet with major industry stakeholders. Numerous meetings with European and international press representatives were organized as part of efforts to expand MAC outreach and communications to the industry and hobbyists in Europe.

UPDATE ON THE MAM STANDARD

Interest is growing in the MAC Mariculture and Aquaculture Management (MAM) Standard and an increasing number of marine ornamental culturing facilities are contacting MAC to find out about how they can become certified to this standard. Final editing of the MAM Standard has almost been completed and MAC is working with a few culturing facilities that have agreed to participate as test cases for the initial certifications to this standard.

Peter Scott, MAC Certification Systems Director, made a presentation on the MAM Standard at the annual global World Aquaculture 2005 Conference (May 9-13, Bali, Indonesia), as the 'soft launch' of the MAM Standard, where there was interest from a number of companies and organizations.
For more information please contact Peter Scott ([email protected]).

COMMUNICATION AND OUTREACH

MAC HHT Standard Documents Available in French and German

As a further part of the increased MAC European outreach, the MAC Handling, Husbandry and Transport (HHT) Standard and the Retailer Master Copy (the supporting document for the HHT International Standard) are now available in French and German. Additional operational support documents, such as the Certification Annual and its complementary forms, have also been translated in these two languages, in order to facilitate the efforts of European companies interested in becoming MAC Certified. These documents are available upon request at [email protected].

MAC Presentation and Participation at Aquarama, Singapore

MAC Executive Director, Paul Holthus, delivered a presentation on MAC Certification at Aquarama, the major two-yearly aquarium industry gathering in Asia (Singapore, 27-29 May). Aquarama Conference attendees were updated on MAC capacity building activities in the Asia/Pacific region and of MAC's work with the industry, hobby and media in North America and Europe and the resulting increase in awareness and participation in MAC Certification. Numerous side meetings were held with companies that are MAC Certified or are seeking to become MAC Certified, as well as with the trade associations and other MAC partners present at this well attended event.

Upcoming MAC Presentations at MACNA 2005 - from Indonesia to the Classroom

The MAC Indonesia Director, Ms Gayatri Lilley-Reksodihardjo, will travel to Washington, DC in September to make a presentation at the Marine Aquarium Conference of North America (MACNA) on "The Life and Future of Marine Ornamentals Collectors in Indonesia". MACNA participants will also be able to hear MAC Americas Director, Mark Schreffler, talk about the value of marine aquaria in classrooms and teaching in a presentation on "Get Connected - Help Protect our Coral Reefs" in the Education theme session of MACNA.

MAC IN THE NEWS

"El MAC Entrena a los Recolectores para Bucear con Seguridad". Noticias. Animalia. January 2005: 19-20. [In Spanish]

"Electing the Future". Guest Editorial by Jacob Lowenstein. Freshwater and Marine Aquarium Magazine. May 2005: 4-6.

"Improving Marine Ornamental Collection: Responsible Harvesting for a Sustainable Hobby". Rezal Kusumaatmadja and Aquilino Alvarez. Tropical Fish Hobbyist. June 2005: 86-88.

"Marine Aquarium Council Update". Aquarium Magazine. June 2005: 21.

"Letters to the Editor". Tropical Fish Hobbyist. June 2005: 14.

"Healthy Reefs, Healthy Fish, Healthy Hobby". Richard Pyle (MAC ad). Tropical Fish Hobbyist. July 2005: 121.

"New method for detecting cyanide in marine fish". Practical Fishkeeping (online news) www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk

"Entretien avec le responsable Français du MAC, Paul Holthus". Herve Rousseau et Florian Lesage. Aquarium Magazine. Hors Série No 7. Juin/Juillet 2005: 14-15. [In French]

"Ensuring Divers that Collect Marine Aquarium Fish in Indonesia are part of a Safe and Sustainable Global Trade in Marine Ornamentals". Paul Holthus. (online article). http://www.diverssite.com.

"New MAC Standard: Mariculture and Aquaculture Production". Paul Holthus and Peter Scott. Pets International Magazine. Volume 17. No 2. March 2005: 37.

"Palawan Project". Manila Bulletin. 10 May, 2005.

"Thinking globally and acting locally- Progress by Marine Ornamentals Collectors, Communities and Companies towards a sustainable trade through MAC Certification". Paul Holthus. OFI Journal. No 48. Jubilee Issue. May 2005:82-89.

"International Standard for mariculture and aquaculture of marine ornamentals". Paul Holthus and Peter Scott. Aquarama Magazine 2005: 41-42.

"The Marine Aquarium Council in Norway". Nathalie Gamain. Pet Scandinavia. Number 2, 2005:21. [In Norwegian]

"El Marine Aquarium Council Estrena Nueva Norma". Noticias. Animalia. May 2005: 19. [In Spanish]

"Sulle Forniture di Pesci Certificati MAC". Notizie di Aquariofilia Internazionale. Hobby Zoo. May 2005. [In Italian]

UPCOMING EVENTS

Special Announcement - Marine Ornamentals' 06

MO 06 will be held on February 13-16, 2006 in Las Vegas, Nevada in conjunction with Aquaculture America 2006. Visit: www.hawaiiaquaculture.org/marineornamentals06.html. The Call for Papers deadline is 15 October, 2005. For more information on submitting papers, hotel rates, and tradeshow contact:
MARINE ORNAMENTALS 2006:
Tel: +1-760-432-4270 Fax: +1-760-432-4275 E-mail: [email protected]
To submit ideas for special sessions contact the co-chairs at:
[email protected], [email protected] or [email protected].

July 11-16: National Marine Educators Association Conference (Maui, Hawaii, USA)

August 11-13: Superzoo East (Atlanta, GA, USA)

September 13-18: Annual AZA Conference (Chicago, IL, USA)

September 16-18: Marine Aquarium Conference of North America (Washington, DC, USA)

September 18-20: Glee Petindex (Birmingham, United Kingdom)

September 21-22: Superzoo West (Las Vegas, NV, USA)

September 21-23: Pet Fair Asia Professional and Pets Links Asia (Shanghai, China)

October 7-9: Backer Pet Industry Christmas Trade Show (Chicago, IL, USA)

October 8-9: ZoorfrExpo (Stockholm, Sweden)

October 6-9: Siszoo (Barcelona, Spain)

November 7-10: China International Pet Show (Guangzhou, China)

November 23-26: Zoosphere (St Petersburg, Russia)

I don't know why the exporter failed to be re-certified or which one it was. Perhaps Mark SS could fill us in.
Mitch
 

Kalkbreath

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
http://tracc.00server.com/Fisheries/cya ... index.html
During one of our expeditions, fishers were observed using cyanide on two occasions although we could smell the prussic acid on several other occasions. Near Pulau Mabul, a large marbled grouper was squirted with cyanide repeatedly and chased from coral head to coral head for over one hour. At one point, the disoriented fish was floating belly up on the surface next to the fishing boat. Before the two fishers could get into the boat to assist the two small children who were unable to maneouvre the fish into the dip net, the grouper recovered sufficiently to head again for the patch reefs below. Eventually, the grouper escaped into a large coral patch which obviously had several caves or passages since even using multiple doses of cyanide, the fishers did not again succeed in getting the fish out into the open.

http://141.84.51.10/riffe/infos/cyanide.html
Cyanide And Dynamite Fishing -
Who's really responsible?

By Michael AW
Carlingford, Australia



The coral reefs in the Asia Pacific islands are under siege by coastal dwellers using cyanide and dynamite to procure fish. This practice has been vehemently condemned by conservation agencies, scuba diving magazines, dive resorts, NGOs (non governmental organizations) and marine scientists as well as all that have their vested interest in the coral reef environment. If the practice continues, it is estimated by the year 2020, all coral reefs in the region will be destroyed.

Spurred by quick bucks and the demand of aquariums and a live fish trade supplying restaurants throughout the region, unscrupulous traders employ agents / locals to harvest reef fishes with sodium cyanide. According to reports from the WWF, over 6000 cyanide divers squirt an estimated 150,000 kg of dissolved poison on some 33 million coral heads annually. Beside the distinct possibility of causing the extinction of these fish species in the region by such a selective culling process , cyanide is not selective. It also indiscriminately kills coral polyps, symbiotic algae and other small reef organisms required for the sustenance of a healthy reef, which will eventually cause the entire ecosystem of the reef to collapse. During the first eight months of 1995, a total catch of 2.3 million kg of live groupers and humped wrasse worth over US$180 million was exported to Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. Another 1.9 million kg of decorative fishes worth US$800,000 was shipped to Europe and North America.

During Ocean N Environment expeditions to Indonesia, I have come to encounter these raiders of the reef. Collectors who expose their life to the risk of cyanide poisoning and decompression sickness due to extended exposure under pressure. They comprise solely of boys from local tribes and sea gypsies. From small collection centres scattered among remote islands each of these outposts gathers an average of 250 tons of Napoleon wrasse and grouper to meet the demand of their middleman in the principal towns of Ujung Pandang and Manado. This selective culling of a species that may live up to 50 years in the wild is considered totally unsustainable by marine scientists. In the short term however, a dinner plate sized Napoleon wrasse which may fetch up to US$800 in a Chinese restaurant in Hong Kong, makes good business acumen for the entrepreneur. Gourmet diners in Hong Kong are willing to part with thousands of dollars for a live fish and will go as far as checking out the freshness of their dinner by viewing swathes of flesh skillfully removed to show the fish's beating heart.



Millions of dollars are invested by numerous environmental agencies mostly donated by the concerned public and corporate sponsors, to research, educate and 'retrain' fisherman to use other forms and methods of fishing. One of these organizations, Haribon Foundation for Conservation of Natural Resources, a leading Philippines NGO has as early as 1990 began a realistic effort to educate local fisherman on the sustainable development of the reef environment by protective netting and methods of collection. Coral Reef Alliance, another conservation agency for the reef, is also promoting retraining as a solution to the cyanide problems.



However, on the other end of the scale, the simple principal of marketing still applies. Whenever there is a demand, someone out there will be sourcing for supply. In Asian culture, consumption of a Napoleon wrasse is not simply a dietary concern, but the status of being able to afford the luxury - to many it is a sign of wealth and status symbol. The South East Asian counties have undoubtedly become a financial power, where a gastronomical feast of Napoleon wrasse and the 'thousand-dollar-a-bowl shark-fin soup mark a successful business transaction. In this regard, the demand for these delicacies is indeed a serious threat to the marine environment.



All governments in the South East Asian countries have excellent laws that declare fishing with both cyanide and dynamite illegal, but implementation and enforcement are two separate issues altogether. Governments in these countries can do nothing to restrict the dietary habits of their own citizens nor a business venture that engages in cyanide fishing by say a Singaporean in Sulawesi, Indonesia for example. In a hypothetical situation, the obvious solution that would inevitably cause the cyanide fishing industry to collapse is for the governments of Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China and even Australia to impose bans on the sale of live Napoleon Wrasse and grouper. If the aquarium trade for ornamental fishes in the USA is causing the degradation of reefs in the Philippines, then ban the tropical fish vendors in that country. Without the demand, there will no call for supply.



In the real world, this is not as simple. When I checked with Dr. Howard Latin, an international conservation law professor from New Jersey, on the possibility of a ban on the sale of live Napoleon wrasse,, his immediate comment was "since the markets for live groupers & Napoleon Wrasse are mainly in Asian countries without strong environmental laws, my analysis wouldn't work and we'd need to find more economical disincentive measures such as boycotts, information disclosure, etc."



Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia and Singapore have a long history of allowing trade in endangered species and it will be unrealistic to expect these importing nations to restrain the businessmen and consumers who want to have these "luxury" fish for consumption. Take Singapore for instance, world renown for law enforcement on its bans on everything from illegal drugs to chewing gum - imposing effective controls would mean the demand of some cyanide free import certificates from merchants and random testing of live fish - the cost and legalities of which may well offend neighboring nations, does not justify the benefits. Singapore does not have much of her own coral reef resources.



In another context, what can these governments offer the poor fishermen who are making considerably higher wages (at the risk of their lives and health) using cyanide to catch a few species in high demand? Take Indonesia as an example. This nation is an archipelago comprised of over 170000 islands, with a population of over 190 million - a high percentage of these people live by and are sustained by the sea and aid is next to non -existent. In our expedition to Tukang Besi, thought to be one of the few remaining untouched coral reef environments we found obvious evidence of frequent dynamite fishing used for the collection of fish to feed the people of it's overpopulated water villages.



A spokesman of Operation Wallacea, told me that they have received over 2 million US dollars in aid from Hong Kong Bank for their research project at Tukang Besi. The operation is charging volunteers up to $3000 to help them document the bio-diversity there in an effort to declare the area a marine reserve. Despite all the good intentions, the crux of the problems has not been addressed. There are simply too many people , and these people need to live. Wouldn't it be much better to spend the 2 million dollars either relocating these people or to help them develop a form of sustainable aqua culture ? In a nut shell, if we were to focus our effort on feeding these people that are practicing dynamite and cyanide fishing, by providing them with resources and skills to improve their quality of life, wouldn't they help us save our reef? The question I posed at my recent presentation on the environment at DEMA Asia in Kuala Lumpur is "What have businesses that profit from the pristineness of coral reefs done for these people whose livelihood has been sustained by the reef's resources?"



The messages scuba and geographical magazines, instruction agencies, resorts and live-aboard vessels promote are environmentally friendly - 'don't touch the reef, don't take anything' . The new breed of divers are a conscious lot. Most divers do little damage to coral reefs, don't remove shells and frown on those who do. One afternoon last year, while on Bunaken island with a group of divers from Australia ,we were approached by a young girl, barely eight years old, carrying a basket of shells to sell. She did not yield a response from any of us. My point to this is simple - while each of us must have paid up to US$150 per day for the privilege of diving in this girl's 'backyard', she did not reap a single cent - while her father was probably out in an outrigger canoe waiting to bring in their next meal.



As long as there are poverty stricken people that are sustained by the sea and as long as there is demand by the rich and wealthy for 'luxury' fish, dynamite and cyanide will continue to send our coral reef to irreversible degradation. We are not ruling out the prospect of having Napoleon wrasse banned from the restaurants of Asia - Pacific countries, but the businesses and responsible divers need to take a closer look at their contribution to the problems. I cite Goodwin's (1996)definition of ecotourism to illustrate my point, as most operators in the diving businesses believe that they provide. " low impact nature tourism which contributes to the maintenance of species and habitats either directly through a contribution to conservation and/or indirectly by providing revenue to the local community sufficient for local people to value, and therefore protect their wildlife heritage area as a source of income. To this end I have not seen many such contributions by either operators or participants, in my last six years of extensive travel. If every operator in the region would start by adopting a village or local community near their operation, providing them with education and a source of income, it shall be a positive start to eliminating dynamite and cyanide off our coral reefs. A boycott by every diver and their friends in Asia from restaurants that serve shark-fin soup and live Napoleon wrasse will also create headlines with the news media. The preservation of the quality of our coral reefs is more than just wearing a Save the Reef T-shirt or sticking a "Responsible Diver" sticker on the family car.

Copyright Michael AW 11/96
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Cited;
"demand by the rich and wealthy for 'luxury' fish, dynamite and cyanide will continue to send our coral reef to irreversible degradation."

My goodness, did he actually imply that tropical were caught with dynamite for the luxury fish trade"?

Steve
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Article by Michael AW

The article is rather dated (11/96). Most of the information was cribbed from publications created by the International Marinelife Alliance (IMA).

Peter Rubec
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"A spokesman of Operation Wallacea, told me that they have received over 2 million US dollars in aid from Hong Kong Bank for their research project at Tukang Besi. The operation is charging volunteers up to $3000 to help them document the bio-diversity ....."
Wow, what an amazing scam....
Getting inexperienced rich people to contribute to a $2,000,000 . fund to survey the biodiversity then convert no one to sustainable practice anyway.

The fund could've done real surveys, follow up monitoring, erased cyanide fishing from Indo...trained all the divers, supplied em all w/ nets for the next 30 years and had change left over to send a few dozen collector reps to the next MACNA to testify with professional video footage....etc...etc...
The success would have then gotten them the next 2 million more easily.
But of course not.
There is no greater crook out there on this issue then eco-frauds who feather their own nests, mal-practice and perpetuate the damage while blaming the trade.
If the trade is guilty, what do you say about its comensal [ or parasitic ]partners in crime?
Geez,
Steve
 

Jaime Baquero

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Steve,

By reading your last post, people would think that the cyanide problem the marine ornamentals industry has in Indonesia could be solve with $2M. Also, readers could get the idea that to solve the problem the only aspect to tackle is net training and supply of nets. You know very well that the problem is more complex than that, otherwise it would have been solved long time ago.

The problem in those countries (PI -IND) is corruption and poverty. Things are going to change when the system in those countries will deal with social issues to aliviate poverty. When they'll decide to do that is because they are tackling corruption also.

The future of coral reefs and fisherfolks is gloomy.
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The excess of money raised in the wrong direction has poisoned and corrupted the waters.
Now people think that without American level budgets, salaries and expenditure, nothing can happen.
Nothing could be futher from the truth.
For some, a great and complete survey could be implemented for 100K.
In the wrong hands, not even $2,000,000.00 US is enough.
Or in rupiah, $2,000,000,000.00 !

Steve
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Question;
How is it that the intolerance for the trades culpability and complicity for its role in environmental mischief is not transferable to the ones riding shotgun on it? :?
The shadow groups basing their salaries and existance on the trade must now share in its defamation as they have become long term fellow travelers with it.
Appyling the same scrutiny and the same outrage to these clans has not occured as they invoked environmental keywords and buzzwords to keep the shallow critics at bay.
I submit that they are not changing the trade so much as the trade is changing them. They are becoming subservient to it and they are "behaving' to continue to enjoy its rewards, much like petty bureaucrats whose mission statement begins with the self.
"They have become what they beheld."
Steve
Most of them resign and fade away....quietly. Quietly as they remember the non-disclosure and secrecy contracts they had to sign before joining.
Whistle blowers?....a few, but usually not as they were never environmentalists to begin with. It was just a job.
Environmental supporters may actually believe...but environmental office holders and salaried workers ...its just another job.
 

Jaime Baquero

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
NGOs are not the ones selling marine ornamentals collected in coral reefs.

NGOs did believe that there was a potential for this trade to become a sustainable activity if changes were adopted by all the stakeholders. Is because of this that those NGOs have supported and implemented different programs in the PI and Ind. Those same NGOs will realize that is going to be impossible to achieve concrete result without industry's and central governments' strong support. As consequence NGOs will conclude that the trade is NOT sustainable, in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the only alternative is a ban.

The trade has not realized the advantage of supporting present and past initiatives developed to correct the situation. The lack of support from that industry and government has been the chain's weak link.

What would happen if there were no regulation and enforcement in USA's coastal waters to collect marine ornamentals/live rock for the trade?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
there's that word 'stakeholders' again...

to this day, i've yet to hear a working definition from the major ngo's as what a 'stakeholder' is, and which 'stakeholders' have which responsibilities, or which are more responsible for the various effects the 'industry' has

:roll:
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Stakeholder;
one who profits from an activity.

When the Loreto Nat'l Park received 70K to monitor, survey and evaluate fish collecting in the park, they found that there were no more fisherman left in the park. Their over regulatory activity killed em all off.

Now, they will authorize some to justify the liquidation of the their grant.
Fisheries and NGOs will profit from the grant but the collectors will not as they will have too many other stakeholders lording over them, evaluating them, observing them and profiting from them. In fact, there have been so many other stake holders wanting to go out and monitor the divers in the boat that there was no room for divers in the boat.

The main diver , Cheech said an NGO guy is the one who gets paid in the fishing boat even if no one catches anything.
While fisherman lament the loss of fuel, bait, time and effort, depreciation of the gear etc....the monitor still gets paid.

Every dog has a few fleas....but if the trend holds true, it will be the fleas that have the dogs.

The pseudo scientific tourist monitor evaluation survey industry is growing...and seeks to keep the poor fisherman at the most marginal level possible without killing him....in order to keep themselves on top.

The whitewashers and the front men of a dirty trade are very much guilty of their clients misdeeds.
Steve
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jaime wrote;
The lack of support from that industry and government has been the chain's weak link.

Add the inept and insincere NGO community to the daisy chain and we have a royal flush....with no one holier then thou to point a finger.
The expose and the constructive remedy however, first came from within the industry....long before the arrival of your favorite No Go's.
Steve
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top