Bowser:
So, the problem occurs when the "guru" decides to sell products?
Of course not. The problem occurs when the "guru" decides to sell products that he/she can't or won't explain. If I market a product called Coral+Vanilla that I claim cures ick becauses I can demonstrate, scientifically, that Vanilla kills cryptocaryon, versus if I just say it's secret Vanilla and enzyme formulation biogenetically retrogrades the ick into feeling very, very ashamed of itself, do you not see a difference?
And you have determined these products to be of no value?
Nope. But I have determined the marketing behind them to be of no value, presenting no satisfactory rationale for their use, no explication of function or process. If I offer to sell you Coral+Charles because I say it's the greatest thing since sliced bread, would you be willing to buy it? If you say yes, it's solely because you have faith in
me, and certainly not because you have any idea of how the product works, what it really does, or what's in it.
Even though you may not like the wording on the advertisement, this is nothing new.
Car ads don't claim to biochemically stimulate your blood matrix into liquid crystal, resulting in your boosted immune system and a pearly white smile, either, which would be comparable to the claims in these manufacturer's ads. They make
specific claims that are just plain scientifically inaccurate. Again, do you not see a difference?
When people say that, for example, brine shrimp has no real nutritional value, they aren't saying this from scientific knowledge of their own making!
No, they're saying it from a body of scientific knowledge from the mariculture industry that gives far greater weight to their statements then if they were simply a lone individual running a few simple experiments.
They are saying this based on the knowledge of someone like Sprung, or Shimek, who has done the actual research. So the people you are bashing are the ones who provided you with the information that you have!
Pardon me, but are you suggesting that because someone has contributed something of value, they reach a mystical state of enlightenment guaranteeing that every statement they make afterwards will always be correct, accurate and insightful? People make mistakes, and the experts are no exceptions. Or haven't you ever noticed that half of them continuously contradict the other half?
the problem I am having with this discussion is the fact that everyone is "saying" the product is bad, yet no one has done any actual testing of it. How can you bash it if you don't know?
For all I know it's God Gift to Reefkeepers. I do not bash it's efficacy (although I've yet to hear any convincing arguments in it's favor, either), I bash it's combination of meaningless claims and lack of disclosure.
Your statement that our tanks are so pristine and natural. LOL That was kinda funny, after all our tanks are anything but pristine and natural!!!
Thank you for making my point for me. Indeed, conditions in our tanks are neither pristine nor natural, even with us striving to make them that way. So again, who in their right mind would add a product of unknown ingrediants to the mix?