Hey, I even put the unit on my friends 180g recently and tested it for a few weeks. No improvement in water clarity, didn't stop algae growth, and it messed up his skimmers action as well.
This product has caused me more problems then any aquaria product I've ever owned
What I find surprising is that you gave this "POS", that caused you more problems then any aquaria product you've ever owned , to a friend. You stated earlier that it had the same results on his tank and yet he left it on his tank for over 2 months.
Are you suggesting that the ECO is responsible for the algae problems or were you trying to correct the problem with the ECO? Try not to get upset with my questions, just trying to understand why and how you come to the conclusions that you are sharing with us. A lot of people have hair algae and cyano problems and to my knowledge none blame the ECO.
This product has caused me more problems then any aquaria product I've ever owned
There is a more tangible explaination for your friends problems.
I'm all ears, but 2 out 2 times its had the same results. I've never expereinced this before iin all my years, in such perfect conditions. I could see if the tanks were under skimmed, lack of water movement, not maintaned, spectrural shift, etc. but that isn't the case in either set-up. My friends 180 is what I'd consider to be my dream set-up. His tank is overskimmed (Aqua-C skimmer), employees 2000g an hour return w/ 2 Sea Swirls, has a highly lit refugium, has fairly new MH bulbs and he's activelly maintaining the system. Its got a calcium reactor with 4 month old media. He only uses r/o di water for all applications, and the ro cartidges are just fine.I find it very hard to believe that this device could cause algae to proliferate.
Was this post really necessary or prudent?
forgive my asking.... seems like something they would do to promote their product
Jime":wcwvfnfj said:righty said:forgive my asking.... seems like something they would do to promote their product
His own words,
No, an edited version of my own words, edited to rationalize your sniping.
I'm just agreeing that he should be forgiven and explaining why I think so.
No you aren't. You are taking pot shots at me, and you know it.
And you are incorrect. 'He doesn't believe anything he reads about this product, unless it is negative' is untrue. I believe much about the product and the company, just not its claims about how the device works, and to a large extent that it does what they say it does.
He asked no follow up questions of GreshamH when he posted his negative review of the ECO.
Perhaps because I had none.