[/color]
I don't think you've really responded to my query.
A. There is hardly any skimmate produced by your skimmer.
May be true. If I had a skimmer produce this much I'd also think a canister might just be a better idea. IT IS NOT!
Anybody who thinks that a canister is going to work in a reef tank either doesn't understand the way the skimmer works or pretends that nitrogen cycle doesn't exist.
No Comment. So, please don't assume I commented on the concepts presented in this statement.
Take a look at these pictures. This is my cup from a Turboflotor (no frills, off shelf) skimmer.
clean cup that will look like pic #1 in little over 24 hours.
WOW how big is your system and that's a lot of skimmate in 24 hours. How much bioload you have there? How much you feed each day? Many members' tank here with over 150G and many fish with top of the line Deltec, or Bubble King did not have that much skimmate in 24 hours.
Whatever you see in the cup, is completely out of the system.
I never dipute this. In fact, I mention this as an advantage in my TV program. A canister will have to "digest" this amount into ammonia then nitrite and then nitrate, compounding high nitrates problem.
Agreed. In freshwater applications, canister is a perfect filter because freshwater inhabitants are not as sensitive to elevated levels of nitrate and water changes are relatively easier. You can easily dump 80-90%
this actually is a wrong method unless your water is treated of the water, fill it up and be fine, something you wouldn't do in a salt water setup as means of nitrate export.
B. You are comparing apples to oranges. One is never going to be better than the other because they serve completely different purpose, it's like comparing SUV with a sports car.
Please trace back my statements, I knew they are for different purposes and thus never compare the two directly so how am I comparing apple and oranges?:scratchch I am actually looking into these methods for another topic which I did not mention here at all.