Rover":1r35r5xr said:
I would like to point out, that (while you may disagree with his facts and conclusions), Kalk has always argued and discussed in a civil (relatively) respectful way. Sticking to the issues and avoiding a lot of the personal tripe that gets thrown around down here. I for one would be dissapointed if he were gone.
you know what rover? imo, the way kalk has treated both mike kirda's, and peter rubec's highly informative REAL DATA repeatedly, is far more insulting to both their intelligence, and the forum's reader's intelligence, than anything anyone here, myself included, has posed in response to kalk.
sticking to the issues? HAH!!
i challenge you to find ONE POST where kalk hasn't tried to obfuscate one issue he's 'chimed in to' w/ misrepresentations of data, and completely unrelated arguments
just one
same goes for that 'tripe comment, too
kalk's a big boy, i'm sure, and should have no problem w/defending himself, in the discussions he gets involved in
infact, i would not like to see him go, either-he's a shining example of what a cyanide apologist is all about-and i for one, am quite happy for others to get their impressions about how a cyanide apologist thinks and acts, via kalk's posts
kalk, you have every right to your opinion, and i profoundly hope you keep on posting exactly the way you do
the amount of material you provide me with is more than i could ever hope for, as an example to use to show people what the good fighters are up against, sometimes