A
Anonymous
Guest
John B and Mark@MAC,
I've seen the quality of fish and corals coming out of some of the MAC certified wholesalers and I must say they were very dissapointing. Of course what I saw were not MAC certified, but it doesn't say much for the facilitys in general. I personaly don't feel that they would or will handle the certified animals any better than the non-certified and this to me is an issue that the MAC must take care of.
I will also restate that, "I have seen MAC certified stickers on tanks in a non-certified store that only sells ORA animals." This is another matter that needs to be addressed within the ranks of MAC.
Mark,
There are many hobbiests that come to this forum to learn what is going on in the conservation/reform arena. Mostly we just just read what the others are saying or ask questions from time to time. Would you please be so kind as to clarify just what it is that "you" think have been "inaccurate/false statements." I would also like to know just what "you" have been doing for the last 5 months and what "positive results" are being made?
There has been much posted throughout this forum on several different threads about improvements that could be made to the MAC and it's programs, policys and approach to the issues at hand, but it they've all been dismissed.
Mark, coralfarmin was asking a pretty simple question, although he didn't word his following comment very well. The truth be told, his coral farmin operation, will not hurt MO fisherman in the PI, as they do not export corals. It could, however affect those in Indo, but then again, it could also do more to save the REEFS in the long run, as in no coral harvested = no reef distruction. You didn't have to burn him. And CF, if you'll do a tiny bit of research, you'll find that they (MAC) want Mariculture to be certified too.
I would like to know exactly why the fish (from those areas) were intercepted, and I don't think the Euro had that much to do with it. With all the MAC certified collection areas (5), collectors (7),and exporters (10) in the PI, I'd think that there would be more than enough fish to go around.
Actually that's not true, with the way it's set up now in the PI, 7 collector groups collecting in 5 collection areas, doesn't that look more like over harvesting of the resources for those areas?
I've seen the quality of fish and corals coming out of some of the MAC certified wholesalers and I must say they were very dissapointing. Of course what I saw were not MAC certified, but it doesn't say much for the facilitys in general. I personaly don't feel that they would or will handle the certified animals any better than the non-certified and this to me is an issue that the MAC must take care of.
I will also restate that, "I have seen MAC certified stickers on tanks in a non-certified store that only sells ORA animals." This is another matter that needs to be addressed within the ranks of MAC.
mark@mac":a3voly2r said:I'm here to clarify some things as MOST of what is being stated here about MAC operations in the Philipinnes and Indonesia is pure propaganda.....
If you all really cared about reeform, why don't you lend some constructive criticism instead of making what are mostly inaccurate/false statements.
I have been working here in the Philipinnes and Indo for 5 months now; and although it certainly doesn't make me an expert, I am seeing positive results from MAC's work that aren't readily apparent to all right now.
Mark
Mark,
There are many hobbiests that come to this forum to learn what is going on in the conservation/reform arena. Mostly we just just read what the others are saying or ask questions from time to time. Would you please be so kind as to clarify just what it is that "you" think have been "inaccurate/false statements." I would also like to know just what "you" have been doing for the last 5 months and what "positive results" are being made?
There has been much posted throughout this forum on several different threads about improvements that could be made to the MAC and it's programs, policys and approach to the issues at hand, but it they've all been dismissed.
Mark@mac":a3voly2r said:Hi CF, do you mean the "F" word as in farmin? which actually takes away from the livelyhood of poor tropical coastal dwellers?coralfarmin":a3voly2r said:Hi,Mark
Would you please point out some possitive aspects.I have made the mistake of "thinking" MAC might be ok.Man, Mac is worse than the F word here.*IMO*
Some positive progress: collectors are being trained in: resource management, better collection techniques, and BETTER post harvest handling.... As was stated here, maybe on another thread; MAC fish have more often been sent to Europe where industry and hobbyists are willing to pay more for quality fish....
Mark
Mark, coralfarmin was asking a pretty simple question, although he didn't word his following comment very well. The truth be told, his coral farmin operation, will not hurt MO fisherman in the PI, as they do not export corals. It could, however affect those in Indo, but then again, it could also do more to save the REEFS in the long run, as in no coral harvested = no reef distruction. You didn't have to burn him. And CF, if you'll do a tiny bit of research, you'll find that they (MAC) want Mariculture to be certified too.
JohnB":a3voly2r said:Certified fish have never stopped flowing from the MAC Certified collecting areas of Barangay Batasan Island and Barangay Tangarin (Clarin). I know you know that buyers in Cebu intercept and purchase these fish before they get to the MAC Certified exporters in Manila. This is an odd situation for what is supposed to be an unbroken certified chain of custody (COC) from the Philippines to the USA.
JohnB":a3voly2r said:Many people know why the MAC Certified Philippine fish suddenly got intecepted from entering the American market.
mark@mac":a3voly2r said:The Euro thing is only one reason for the minimal supply... you know the some of the other reasons but only state the negative.
mark@mac":a3voly2r said:and lastly for today, (you're all going to love this one) There are now also fish available to the US again...... I could post a list but it's a bit long...
I would like to know exactly why the fish (from those areas) were intercepted, and I don't think the Euro had that much to do with it. With all the MAC certified collection areas (5), collectors (7),and exporters (10) in the PI, I'd think that there would be more than enough fish to go around.
Actually that's not true, with the way it's set up now in the PI, 7 collector groups collecting in 5 collection areas, doesn't that look more like over harvesting of the resources for those areas?