I dont think it is fair to characterize basically every B&M based upon your personal B&M experiences.
Frankly, I think I'm being a hell of a lot fairer to the B&Ms then Kalk is being to the e-tailers. I've been in hundreds if not thousands of LFS, all across this country and in four others, besides. I don't paint every B&M with the same brush, I just maintain (as most hobbyists will, if asked) that there are an awful lot of bad LFS out there. Even in your example, a minimum 50% of those on your list fall into that category, another 16% are "hit and miss", and another 16% (the one you describe as the best of the lot) you describe essentially as having attitude problems. I think it's silly to think that the average etailer customer is buying from an etailer simply for the price; if there weren't other reasons for hobbyists not caring to do business with their LFS', I doubt guys like Kalk would feel so threatened by them.
I mean, really. Who doesn't prefer to be able to browse the real thing to looking at photos? Who likes waiting on shipping, not to mention paying for it and making sure to be there (on a week day, in the vast majority of cases) when it's delivered? Yet etailers popularity continues to sky rocket, despite the obvious hassles - and even when the product they offer is
not competitive, price wise, with what LFS carry. Morgan Lidster and Inland Aquatics. The guys selling captive-raised dwarf angels for hundreds of bucks each. The old solomons farms, before they shuffled off this mortal coil. Steve Tyree's limited edition specimens... the ones that go for ridiculous money, and have a two year waiting list besides. Just to name a few. Clearly, it's not all about price.