Kalkbreath":1dynfuy4 said:
If ninty percent of the overhead comes from a facility which they only ship ten percent of the gross sales . Then this is an expensive toy.
If and when they ship most of their own fish out of Wisconson then its a direct overhead correlation. Only then will the playing field be fair on price.
And then they still will have to find a way to create their own customers and stop stealing them away from traditional LFS. :wink:
Once again, I think you are mistaken in seperating fish and corals from hard goods here. One ownership group, several business "names", but all checks come from the same place. If you look at it my way, than the percentages are probably the other way around 90% out of Wisonsin, and 10% from Cali.
I see your point, I just don't consider them seperate businesses...my opinion only, though. Let me offer an analogy. There is a photography studio at the local KMart. Seperate business name, and yet the checks are still made out to Kmart. A woman in my neighborhood worked there, and her pay check came from KMart.
Another issue, using your argument, is that all of the customer service people ( those who handle emails, invoicing, technical support, etc. for liveaquaria, are also in Wisconsin, I believe. Wouldn't this make their salry and benefits part of the overhead? What about the percentage of office space the occupy? And the utilities, rent, computer equipment, etc. for this space?
Look, I see your point here. In fact, I come from the B&M side of this business (many moons ago) and would still be there today had I known then what I know now. I refused to adapt to a changing marketplace and watched as my customers all gravitated away to the new (at the time) big box pet chains.