The Zeobak is added daily because when you dose Zeostart2 (the actual carbon source that is dosed to help keep the tank at ultra low nutrient conditions) cyanobacteria and certain algae will constantly compete with the zeo bacteria in colonization. Once your zeobacteria is established, many have documented a decrease in dosing but you must still continue to dose because of the carbon dosing. You don't want cyano to win the battle. Also, because your zeolites are changed out once every 6-8 weeks, you need to recolonize your zeolite rocks with zeobacteria as well.
Well, you see, this just doesn't fit with the way that bacterial populations tend to work in culture. It's a racetrack condition. A couple of drops of bacterial concentrate per week will, by themselves, have no appreciable effect on the nutrient levels of the system unless they multiply and colonize the tank. However, as evinced by the need to dose them constantly, this is apparently not the case. Additionally, if they're being out-competed by cyanobacteria, they're certainly not going to help eliminate it unless dosed in massive enough quantities that they can out-compete the cyano for nutrients and/or colonized space based on sheer population pressure. The only way that this additive would have any effect would be if the bacteria were -more- competitive in the ULN conditions -- but, again, if this were the case, you wouldn't have to keep dosing them once they got a foothold, unless the nutrient levels were -so- low that the bacterial populations were constantly dying off -- but that makes no sense either.
It just doesn't pass the microbiological sniff test, without being able to lay hands on scientific data that shows it actually does have an affect.
Realize also, when you say the bacteria will colonize the rock, I only have 200lbs. of rock in my 600gallon system. By general rule, that is not enough rock. Also realize, that the chemisty is completely different. You no longer use denitrifying bacteria for breakdown of ammonia as the zeolite rocks aim at absorbing and containing ammonia itself.
The amount of bacteria in a couple of grams -- I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for their cell counts, and say an ounce -- of well-colonized, porous live rock exceed, by far, the amount of bacteria in a couple of drops of this additive.
I've also seen nothing to indicate that these bacteria are using different nutrient pathways than the usual nitrifying bacteria found in our tanks. In fact, I'd be extremely surprised to find out that Zeobac were anything but cultures of a few of the strains of nitrifying bacteria normally found in our tanks.
If the bacteria aren't utilizing ammonia and nitrites, what the hell are they doing? How are they adding anything to the system (besides a tiny sip of extra cells for our SPS to ingest?) What, exactly, are they using for nutrients? The zeobac food additive is, I'm assuming, a carbon source, like vodka dosing. Remember the building blocks of biological material -- Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Nitrogen. (Plus a little bit of phosphorous and a few other things in trace amounts.) For nitrifying bacteria in our tank, the limiting factor on their metabolism is often free carbon -- thus, the added alcohol/sugar as a carbon source. Since the zeo bacteria food product obviously isn't a nitrogen or phosphorous source, and is just as obviously not a significant source of oxygen or hydrogen compared to the rest of the tank, it has to be a carbon source. Since I'm guessing that it doesn't smell like alcohol, it's probably some sort of sugar.
I'm not sure about the amino acids. I do know that there is distinctively different products called Zeofood7 and High Amino Acids for SPS and LPS. Pretty sure they're not the same product so I do wonder what you mean by labeling Amino Acids as Food.
Sorry, I should have been more specific there. That was per zeovitusa's description of "Amino Acid LPS" at
http://www.zeovitusa.com/product.php?productid=16151&cat=250&page=1 -- there's similar looseness of terminology throughout the site. Now, while the terminology used on the site may have been created by their marketing droids, I distrust scientific looseness in something that sells itself by using applied micro and macrobiology.
Finally, the zeolite rocks are completely different than live rock.
I know, which is why I object to the price.
Live rock is hard to ship, hard to store, and has to take time to colonize or cure if you're making it from scratch or pulling it straight out of the ocean -- zeolites are hucked up out of the ground and chucked in bags which may sit around with no special environmental conditions needed to preserve their qualities for years. (After all, they've already sat out a few million....)
The only reason the zeovit zeolites are so damned much is because no one's had a lab look at them and gone "okay, these are Type X zeolites, I can those for a quarter of the price a pool store!" In other words, their price is due only to the secrecy they can maintain about their sources and the exact makeup of their materials.
I agree, there is very much unknown factors in the zeo method. But through the zeovit forums and speaking directly to people like Albert at proline aquatics and Bob and Alexander on the forums, many zeo users that have successful tanks for years have a better in depth knowledge of the chemistry and what each product really does. I'm still learning myself, but with anything new, you sometimes have to put aside what you've learned already and just try to start with an open mind. I know the big controversy is the detailed ingredients to the products but thats how Thomas Pohl feeds his family. Even without the details put out, Brightwell has "copied" the method.
That's the problem I have with the zeo method; I can't find any scientific data on it. I can't find data on the bacterial strains used in supplementation, I can't find nutrient content and concentration of the additives, I can't find jack-squat but lots of anecdotes. For all I know I really could just replace all the zeo additives with water, and the bacterial food with a sugarwater solution, and have the same results. The only thing I'm fairly sure of as to effect is the zeolite material, since their ability to trap nitrogenous compounds while releasing light metals (usually Na or Ca, I'm guessing Ca, in this type of material) is well understood and documented.
Advances in our hobby come from advances in understanding, and in advances in science. With all of the black boxes involved, the Zeo system is more voodoo than science. I'm not saying that the Zeovit system doesn't generally work -- but any time you combine a profit motive with black-box science, you get a real temptation to start selling snake-oil. Since I can't find any proof to the contrary, I've gotta rely on my own, finely honed BS detector.
Again,
from what I can infer from the limited information available, it seems like you could duplicate the greatest part of the zeovit system through carbon dosing, not feeding much, and using Purigen or some other nitrogenous-compound scavenger. Or just more LR.
As it stands, though, I won't touch what I don't understand with a ten-foot pole, when it comes to adding it to my tank. And in this case, my lack of understanding is not endogenous, but because the information about the system that a company is selling to consumers is deliberately hidden.