sjfishguy wrote:
So there you go, more advice from your only proponent on this board and from someone who ACTUALLY KEEPS THESE SHARKS........ SUCCESSFULLY
.
as someone who claims to 'keep these sharks successfuly', i's still waiting for you to answer my questions
i'm also quite curious as to how long you've kept them-succesfully
These were worthless posts. They did nothing but start an argument. There is a time and place to post criticism. But IMO when someone comes to the board with an animal that is in pain and dying and the owner wants/needs help these type of posts drive people away. They serve no helpful purpose
wrong on all counts, imho.
i think a critical post serves a very useful purpose
the critical posts have absolutely nothing to do w/being argumentative-they are trying to show someone the posters opinion of their being wrong in the attempt, and why-nothing more.
the fact that jason may have taken them personally(or you, for that matter)is not the criticizers fault
i also do not accept the contention that someone who does not thoroughly research an animal before accepting the responsibility of it's care really deserves a heck of alot of sympathy-and if they're looking for a shoulder to cry on-should look elsewhere for mindless sympathy posts from others
if i go and buy a horse, and read only one or two books, and don't ask anyone who's actually kept a horse what's involved in its care in DETAIL, and then put the horse in substandard conditions, after it's possibly being not in the best condition to begin with, resulting in the horse wsting away, and dying of infection-should i expect sympathy for the results of my actions? hell no!!
the central argument seems to be one of the level of responsibility one takes for their charges, and the definition of responsibility itself
i, for one, do not think for a moment that jason had any malicious intent, and i certainly tried to criticize his actions in the most constructive way i could, given my opinions on the matter, but my critique still stands-and hopefully helped to open jason's eyes abit-with regard to really researching sharks in detail
you are really the one who's 'stoking the fire', here, imo.
being jason's 'only proponent' doesn't make you more correct, less argumentative, or even necessarily more valuable to jason's future experiences/attempts at keeping sharks
they are a highly specialized animal, with specialized requirements-whenever someone approaches me wanted to keep that type of animal, and i am not familiar with their experience/knowledge, i always try to steer them away from keeping it, until i am absolutely convinced they are capable of doing that animal justice
just encouraging someone and giving them a shoulder to cry on does not help further succes in the future attempt
Just cause you get something published doesn't make it truth.
turnabout is fair play :wink:
Now, Jason, from experience, you shark did indeed die from a bacterial infection as a result of microscopic tears in their skin.
interesting how you can make such a definitive diagnosis w/out so much as a culture sample of the wounds, or observing the shark in person
You just have to hope they won't get one.
anyone who thinks that keeping an animal that's known to be prone to infection, is difficult to treat, ands then offers the caveat that 'you just have to hope they won't get one'-is an idiot, and a very dangerous advice giver
what if it does?
what will you then tell jason after giving him your personal go ahead and ok regarding getting another shark, if it get's infected again?-'them's the breaks' ?
shame on you