Righty":150quepw said:John, what other products do you think would shock us if we knew how they were made or worked?
Richard, that list would include almost anything for aquariums. The important question is, "Does it really do what the manufacturer claims it does?" Tools like screwdrivers are wonderful inventions and we have found multiple uses for them. But a screwdriver is made for just that, a driver of screws. If we use it to open paint cans (which they usually do quite well) and we don't like it's performance we can't exactly blame the manufacturer.
There are problems with workmanship and user-friendliness almost across the board on aquarium devices. A nicely-designed, functional piece of equipment is a jewel to be coveted in this hobby. It often seems to me that manufacturers cannot use their own inventions, otherwise they would immediately change aspects of their design. It should be a law within the hobby that manufacturers be forced to use their own products with aquariums full of animals that they love
Aquarium-related equipment, devices, supplies, etc. that deserve to be performance-tested include:
Eco-Aqualizer.
Grounding probes.
Hanging, canister and "wheel-type" devices as biological filters.
Hobbyist-sized fluidized bed filters.
Hobbyist-sized ultraviolet sterilizers.
Protein skimmers.
Trickle or wet/dry devices as biological filters.
Water pumps and powerheads as flow output and reliability.
Biological, chemical and mechanical medias.
Hobbyist test kits and electronic meters.
Lighting systems and lamps.
Foods.
Supplements and "nutrients".
Medications and substances used to control disease.
Algicides and cyanobacteria "remedies".
Source water purification devices.
Puffer pinching devices.
Bacteria and "cycling" additives.
Salt mixes.
I'm sure there are other things that could be added to this list.